Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [JetPack Compose] add ability to customise espresso dependency version #866

Merged

Conversation

sravanmedarapu
Copy link
Member

@sravanmedarapu sravanmedarapu commented Mar 28, 2023

  • Recent espresso version bump to 3.5.1 found to be quite flaky for us, especially tests taking twice longer(e.g findElement/s with xpath significantly slower).
  • The proposed changes would give possibility to parameterise espresso version.

@sravanmedarapu sravanmedarapu force-pushed the parameterise-espresso-version branch 2 times, most recently from 88b8349 to 9efe033 Compare March 28, 2023 23:12
@sravanmedarapu sravanmedarapu changed the title [feat]: Add ability to customise espresso dependency version feat: Add ability to customise espresso dependency version Mar 28, 2023
@sravanmedarapu sravanmedarapu changed the title feat: Add ability to customise espresso dependency version feat: add ability to customise espresso dependency version Mar 28, 2023
@KazuCocoa KazuCocoa merged commit 8b62ecb into appium:master Mar 29, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2023
## [2.20.0](v2.19.0...v2.20.0) (2023-03-29)

### Features

* add ability to customize espresso version ([#866](#866)) ([8b62ecb](8b62ecb))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.20.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@sravanmedarapu sravanmedarapu changed the title feat: add ability to customise espresso dependency version feat: [JetPack Compose] add ability to customise espresso dependency version Mar 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants