Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 9, 2019. It is now read-only.

Error after pacman (5.0.0-1) upgrade #221

Closed
dR3b opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 11 comments
Closed

Error after pacman (5.0.0-1) upgrade #221

dR3b opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 11 comments
Labels

Comments

@dR3b
Copy link

dR3b commented Feb 1, 2016

Hi,
I got this error after pacman (5.0.0-1) upgrade:

user1@pc1 ~ % sudo pacman -S archlinuxfr/yaourt
resolving dependencies...
warning: cannot resolve "pacman<4.3", a dependency of "package-query"
warning: cannot resolve "package-query>=1.4", a dependency of "yaourt"
:: The following package cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable dependencies:
      yaourt

:: Do you want to skip the above package for this upgrade? [y/N] N
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: package-query: requires pacman<4.3
:: yaourt: requires package-query>=1.4


user1@pc1 ~ % sudo pacman -Ss pacman
core/pacman 5.0.0-1 (base base-devel) [installed]
    A library-based package manager with dependency support
@f2404
Copy link
Collaborator

f2404 commented Feb 1, 2016

@Skunnyk This looks like a good reason to release package-query/yaourt with pacman 5.0 support :)

@f2404
Copy link
Collaborator

f2404 commented Feb 1, 2016

@dR3b Switching to git versions (package-query-git, yaourt-git) could serve as a temporary solution.

@Skunnyk
Copy link
Member

Skunnyk commented Feb 1, 2016

The AUR package for package-query is now update

@benjarobin
Copy link
Contributor

testdb no longer exist :
pacman can check the validity of the local and sync databases (-Dk and -Dkk respectively). This replaces the 'testdb' software (FS#42444)

@f2404
Copy link
Collaborator

f2404 commented Feb 1, 2016

@benjarobin Thanks - created issue #222

@larchunix
Copy link
Collaborator

testdb error should be fixed by #223.

@dR3b
Copy link
Author

dR3b commented Feb 1, 2016

Works! Thanks

@f2404
Copy link
Collaborator

f2404 commented Feb 1, 2016

@dR3b Great! The issue can be closed, I guess?

@dR3b
Copy link
Author

dR3b commented Feb 1, 2016

Yes please.

@larchunix
Copy link
Collaborator

Reopen to avoid more duplicates.

@larchunix
Copy link
Collaborator

The storm should be over.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants