Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update for Kernel 4.11 #118

Closed
fryfrog opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 19 comments · Fixed by #127
Closed

Update for Kernel 4.11 #118

fryfrog opened this issue May 25, 2017 · 19 comments · Fixed by #127

Comments

@fryfrog
Copy link

fryfrog commented May 25, 2017

I'm sure you already know, but 4.11.2 is out.

@fryfrog
Copy link
Author

fryfrog commented May 26, 2017

Looks like a new stable release of OpenZFS is needed, according to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-linux/

@philmmanjaro
Copy link

Please check my PKGBUILD for which patches are needed to get it compiled for v4.11 series.

@demizer demizer changed the title Kernel 4.11.2 arrived a day or two ago Update for Kernel 4.11 Jun 15, 2017
@fafische
Copy link

@demizer Do the devellopers of zfsonlinux know our updates are blocked for more than 3 weeks by now?
Can you try to speed things up, a little bit?

@philmmanjaro
Copy link

The issue is more with this rather than with patches: openzfs/spl#620 Using gcc6 it is fine.

@andrewgdunn
Copy link

@fafische be aware that there are issues upstream as @philmmanjaro alludes to. Squawk upstream if you're annoyed.

@demizer
Copy link
Contributor

demizer commented Jun 16, 2017

@fafische you can install the archzfs-linux-git packages if you need to upgrade your kernel. Give upstream some time to fix it right.

@alaricljs
Copy link

https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-0.6.5.10 Looks like what's needed has landed.

@demizer
Copy link
Contributor

demizer commented Jun 21, 2017

@alaricljs I have released packages with that ZOL version. It does not fix the gcc 7.1 errors. That is scheduled for the next release: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/spl/projects/1#card-3418392

@alaricljs
Copy link

@demizer ick, nice timing on that, missed the gcc issue. When will the packages you released hit the archzfs.com/archzfs repo? I'll gladly roll back gcc :)

@demizer
Copy link
Contributor

demizer commented Jun 21, 2017

@alaricljs you can install the archzfs-linux-git packages if you want to update your kernel. Personally, I am holding off on updating my kernel because I don't need anything from 4.11 and so I can wait until a new ZOL version is released.

I don't want to require gcc 6.3 because that will break the install unless gcc 6.3 has been explicitly installed.

@andrewgdunn
Copy link

@demizer when the prompt comes through when trying to -Syu, if you hit y does it just update the other packages? I don't proceed for fear that it would update the kernel itself and then I'd be unable to use ZFS.

@philmmanjaro
Copy link

Simply add openzfs/spl@4f8e643 as patch and it compiles fine with gcc 7.1.1 ...

@demizer
Copy link
Contributor

demizer commented Jun 21, 2017

@storrgie you can use --ignore linux to ignore the kernel package. Otherwise pacman will exit early because it cannot satisfy the kernel dependency for archzfs.

@saghm
Copy link

saghm commented Jun 25, 2017

You can also add linux to IgnorePkg line in your /etc/pacman.conf (uncomment if needed) and then just continue updating as normal, which is what I've been doing while waiting. You might also need to add a couple other things to be ignored if they have updates relying on a newer kernel as well (e.g. linux-headers and nvidia for me).

@saghm
Copy link

saghm commented Jul 17, 2017

Will the packages hosted at demizerone.com be updated?

@fryfrog
Copy link
Author

fryfrog commented Jul 17, 2017

Comments imply we won't get packages until this compiles with gcc 7.1, so should this issue maybe stay open?

@minextu
Copy link
Member

minextu commented Jul 17, 2017

It does compile again, that's why this issue has been closed. @demizer is currently testing all recent changes, as far as I know.

@fryfrog
Copy link
Author

fryfrog commented Jul 18, 2017

Ah, cool! :)

@fryfrog
Copy link
Author

fryfrog commented Jul 27, 2017

This never did actually get resolved and now 0.7.0 is here. Maybe next time keep the issue open so it is easier to surface by others?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants