Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1056 removes nodes from AREDNMesh.org map #309

Closed
k6ccc opened this issue Mar 19, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

1056 removes nodes from AREDNMesh.org map #309

k6ccc opened this issue Mar 19, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@k6ccc
Copy link

k6ccc commented Mar 19, 2022

Updated several types of nodes from 1049 to 1056 and uploaded data to AREDN servers. It uploads alright - but not correctly. Every node I uploaded, disappeared from the map. Node types updated were:
Rocket M3 XM
Rocket M5 XW
hAP AC lite
LHG 5nD
LHG 2nD
GL iNet USB150
GL iNet AR750

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 19, 2022

Took a look at the payload 1056 is generating (this whole things was broken in 1049) and it appears correct. I ran It through a json validator and it think's is fine.

The payload no longer contains a flag indicating tunnel software is installed and the api has been bumped to 1.10 so perhaps this it making the backend croak? @dman776

@k1ky
Copy link

k1ky commented Apr 1, 2022

Would it not make sense for the payload to report that Tunnel is installed since we will have a mixture of older firmware nodes with and without Tunnel installed? These new Nightly loads do appear to publish on the KX6WXC MeshMap running on our stand-alone servers.

@dman776
Copy link
Contributor

dman776 commented Apr 1, 2022

This original issue was resolved a few days ago.it was not a firmware issue.

@dman776 dman776 closed this as completed Apr 1, 2022
@dman776
Copy link
Contributor

dman776 commented Apr 1, 2022

The removal of the tunnel indicator was a temporary fix. It will be added back soon to the maps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants