Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ubiquiti PowerBeam M5 (PBE-M5-620-US) only links at 100 Mbps #322

Closed
compsci282 opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Ubiquiti PowerBeam M5 (PBE-M5-620-US) only links at 100 Mbps #322

compsci282 opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@compsci282
Copy link

This device out of the box connects at 1 gigabit speeds without an issue.

After installing an using ARDEN firmware version 3.22.1.0 the link always drops to 100 megabit. I'm not sure if this is by design or not. Forcing the connection to use 1 Gbps on several different switches always disconnected the device with ARDEN firmware installed.

I realize that a 100 Mbps ethernet connection is quite appropriate for a 150+ Mbps wifi device, but it would be nice to have the full hardware capability available. Obviously this is not a high priority.

@K6AH
Copy link

K6AH commented Mar 31, 2022

This has been fixed before. I had this problem a couple years ago with a PBE-M5-620 on the Elsinore Pk link to San Marcos Pk. So may be a regression issue, or perhaps a hack to resolve the issue I had.

@dman776
Copy link
Contributor

dman776 commented Apr 27, 2022

to turn off the 100mbps port lock on devices, comment out the lines in /etc/rc.local:


Put your custom commands here that should be executed once

the system init finished. By default this file does nothing.

/etc/init.d/dnsmasq start

BOARDID=$(/usr/local/bin/get_boardid)
case "$BOARDID" in
0xe885|0xe4e5|0xe6e5)
/usr/sbin/ethtool -s eth0 speed 100 duplex full autoneg off
;;
esac

exit 0

Try this and report back your results.

@dman776
Copy link
Contributor

dman776 commented Aug 9, 2022

closing. no reply.

@dman776 dman776 closed this as completed Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants