Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LQM Disconnects Mesh Node from Network #404

Closed
tsdxmad opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

LQM Disconnects Mesh Node from Network #404

tsdxmad opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@tsdxmad
Copy link

tsdxmad commented Jun 17, 2022

After installing the latest firmware version 3.22.6.0 on an Ubiquiti M5 XW, I enabled LQM without making any changes. The link quality was not the greatest to other nodes, but worked with a SNR of 15 or 16 to one of our backhaul nodes. After about 8 min, LQM blocked all signals and knocked the node off the network. I did manage to get a screen shot of "Neighbor Status" showing this, just before getting kicked to the curb. Please see below. It seems the node should leave the best connection active and not block all regardless of settings.
LQM Block 2

.

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Jun 27, 2022

What makes a good 'failsafe' behavior remains unclear. At the moment, when a node is first setup and it cannot find a viable link, it reduces its requirements until at least one RF link is valid. Here, a link was valid originally, but became invalid over time (because radio) cutting off the node. Not great. However, what is a good recovery strategy? Making sure a single RF connection works doesn't necessarily get the node back not he mesh ... maybe that one connection is just to a local neighbor which doesn't get you much (which is also a limitation of the current strategy). Dropping the requirements to allow all RF nodes to work would result in poor performance for the node, and impact general mesh performance.

Other options might include having much lower requirements for nodes which are upgraded to LQM (rather than newly installed nodes which might have more idea requirements) to reduce the chances of cutting off existing nodes. But this also reduces potential performance improvements.

I'm open to suggestions and thoughts on this.

@ab7pa
Copy link
Contributor

ab7pa commented Jul 22, 2022

@tsdxmad LQM also gives you total control over the signal level that will be blocked, so you can adjust it down to lower levels if you desire.

Screen Shot 2022-07-22 at 8 35 48 AM

@dman776 dman776 closed this as completed Jul 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants