Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gateway error when going to SETUP #763

Closed
KenHorse opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 16 comments
Closed

Gateway error when going to SETUP #763

KenHorse opened this issue Mar 25, 2023 · 16 comments

Comments

@KenHorse
Copy link

I just flashed 2 PBE-5AC-400 with the latest nightly build (dated today). All went fine but when trying to get to SETUP, I'm prompted for credentials (which I enter) and then I'm greeted with a "Bad Gateway The process did not produce any response" error.

This is happening on 2 of 2 units

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

Can you post a screenshot of the main status page immediately before hitting 'setup'?

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

Note that this hardware is not in the support list.

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

20230324_171248
20230324_171255

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

Oh? There's a difference between it and a Gen2?

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

Please click on the text reading "!!!! UNSUPPORTED DEVICE !!!!" and post the information it should display. It's probably easy to add this.

@aanon4 aanon4 reopened this Mar 25, 2023
@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

No such text

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

? I see it in red on your first photo ?

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

Oh duh..the banner..

node: NOCALL-80-102-111
model: 0xe7f5

!!!! UNSUPPORTED DEVICE !!!!
boardid: 0xe7f5
Device HAS BEEN TESTED AS UNSUPPORTED

br-lan F0:9F:C2:51:66:6F
eth0 F0:9F:C2:51:66:6F
eth0.1 F0:9F:C2:51:66:6F
eth0.2 F0:9F:C2:51:66:6F
tunl0 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-44-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
wlan0 F0:9F:C2:50:66:6F

/proc/cpuinfo
system type : Atheros AR9342 rev 2
machine : Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2
processor : 0
cpu model : MIPS 74Kc V4.12
BogoMIPS : 266.64
wait instruction : yes
microsecond timers : yes
tlb_entries : 32
extra interrupt vector : yes
hardware watchpoint : yes, count: 4, address/irw mask: [0x0ffc, 0x0ffc, 0x0ffb, 0x0ffb]
isa : mips1 mips2 mips32r1 mips32r2
ASEs implemented : mips16 dsp dsp2
Options implemented : tlb 4kex 4k_cache prefetch mcheck ejtag llsc dc_aliases perf_cntr_intr_bit perf
shadow register sets : 1
kscratch registers : 0
package : 0
core : 0
VCED exceptions : not available
VCEI exceptions : not available

nvram
hsmmmesh.settings=settings
hsmmmesh.settings.wifimac='f0:9f:c2:50:66:6f'
hsmmmesh.settings.mac2='80.102.111'
hsmmmesh.settings.node='NOCALL-80-102-111'
hsmmmesh.settings.dtdmac='81.102.111'

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

BTW, the firmware is clearly shown at the selector webpage. That's where I got it

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

While I see "Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2" and the "Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC 500" in the selector, I do not see the 400 variant listed.

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

Am I mistaken that the hardware reports itself as "machine : Ubiquiti PowerBeam 5AC Gen2"

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

That's reporting what the firmware loaded onto the device is, not the device itself which is identified by the hex code boardid.

@KenHorse
Copy link
Author

KenHorse commented Mar 25, 2023

I saw /proc/cpuinfo and assumed it read the info from there

OK, well guess I'll wait for the build

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 25, 2023

#765

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Mar 28, 2023

A build should now be available. If you could verify that'd be fantastic.

@KenArck
Copy link

KenArck commented Apr 14, 2023

Really sorry for the delay. Yes, all is working fine with the new build

@aanon4 aanon4 closed this as completed Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants