Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MikroTik SXTsq Lite2 support beyond 3.22.12.0 #780

Closed
AJ6GZ opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

MikroTik SXTsq Lite2 support beyond 3.22.12.0 #780

AJ6GZ opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@AJ6GZ
Copy link

AJ6GZ commented Apr 7, 2023

SXTsq Lite2 (RBSXTsq2nD) not yet supported post-3.22.12.

@AJ6GZ
Copy link
Author

AJ6GZ commented Apr 11, 2023

Upgrade from 3.22.12.0 to 2517 via UI fails due to node reporting itself as 'rb-lhg-5nd' under 3.22.12 (Confirmed on two nodes).
Was able to upgrade via sysupgrade -F. Once upgraded it shows as 'routerboard-sxt-2nd'.

Other than that it appears stable in a live environment.

----- BEFORE
(Status page)
model: MikroTik RouterBOARD RBSXTsq2nD

(Administration page)
Current Version: 3.22.12.0 Hardware Type: (ar71xx/mikrotik) mikrotik (rb-lhg-5nd)

root@AJ6GZ-Portable1-SXT2:~# sysupgrade -n /tmp/rb.bin
Device rb-lhg-5nd not supported by this image
Supported devices: mikrotik,routerboard-sxt-2nd rb-sxt-2nd
Image check failed.

----- AFTER
root@AJ6GZ-Portable1-SXT2:~# sysupgrade -F /tmp/rb.bin
Device rb-lhg-5nd not supported by this image
Supported devices: mikrotik,routerboard-sxt-2nd rb-sxt-2nd
Image check failed but --force given - will update anyway!
Saving config files...
Commencing upgrade. Closing all shell sessions.

(Status page)
model: MikroTik RouterBOARD SXT 2nD (SXT Lite2)

(Administration page)
Current Version: 2517-e5a0b43 Hardware Type: (ath79/mikrotik) mikrotik (routerboard-sxt-2nd)

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Apr 11, 2023

Yeah - should have that fixed in tomorrow's build.

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Apr 11, 2023

#784

@Orv
Copy link

Orv commented Apr 14, 2023

This image now installs and behaves as expected. This issued may be closed.

@aanon4
Copy link
Contributor

aanon4 commented Apr 14, 2023

Thanks!

@aanon4 aanon4 closed this as completed Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants