Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HowTo] Expand Sonoff Basic to 4MB Flash #2035

Closed
reloxx13 opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

[HowTo] Expand Sonoff Basic to 4MB Flash #2035

reloxx13 opened this issue Feb 26, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
stale Action - Issue left behind - Used by the BOT to call for attention

Comments

@reloxx13
Copy link
Contributor

Hey guys,

i want to share you a guide to expand the flash from 1MB to 4MB of a sonoff basic.

You can find it in the Wiki :)

info

@reloxx13 reloxx13 changed the title [HowTO] Expand Sonoff Basic to 4MB Flash [HowTo] Expand Sonoff Basic to 4MB Flash Feb 26, 2018
@Oxyandy
Copy link

Oxyandy commented Feb 26, 2018

Yeah, and the real benefit to doing this ?

@reloxx13
Copy link
Contributor Author

reloxx13 commented Feb 26, 2018

  • avoid flashing minimal firmware,

  • use webserver and ssl

  • be ready for future bigger firmwares with more features 👍

  • have fun doing it yourself :D

@arendst
Copy link
Owner

arendst commented Feb 27, 2018

Alas, iram is full already resulting in no more interrupt driven code. The amount of ram is very low which makes further expansion also impossible. TLS uses too much ram. Flash is not the issue.

Bottomline, upgrading flash is useless when you're out of ram and that's just the case with an ESP8266.

I have a ledunia with 32MB (yes that's 32MB) and still no reliable TLS as, you guessed it, no more ram available.

The only advantage of bigger flash is that, if it has inbuilt flash management, it moves the written flash pages around within it's chip leading to longer lifetime. But even then I still have to see an ESP8266 dead because of too many flash writes.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Action - Issue left behind - Used by the BOT to call for attention label Jun 6, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 21, 2018

This issue will be auto-closed because there hasn't been any activity for a few months. Feel free to open a new one if you still experience this problem.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jun 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale Action - Issue left behind - Used by the BOT to call for attention
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants