Add MessagePackSerializer

[ahopkins]

Fixes #362

[ahopkins]

See #362

[argaen]

Thanks for the contribution! I won't have a laptop until the 9th. I'll check the builds and all that and then merge and do a new release :)

[argaen]

@ahopkins the msgpack requirement is missing in setup.py :). Without it build can't pass

[ahopkins]

Got it. I'll add, and I also want to add use_list=False otherwise it cannot handle deaerializing dictionaries. Adam Hopkins

…

On Jan 15, 2018, 3:37 PM +0200, Manuel Miranda ***@***.***>, wrote: @ahopkins the msgpack requirement is missing in setup.py :). Without it build can't pass — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #370 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #370   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           9      9           
  Lines         836    844    +8     
  Branches       88     89    +1     
=====================================
+ Hits          836    844    +8

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
aiocache/serializers.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 50a90bc...9f8edec. Read the comment docs.

[argaen]

I've added some changes to finish this MR and pass the tests. I have removed the use_list option because instead of hardcoding it I want to allow the user to pass it in the constructor. Next MR will be about this :).

Once I have the next MR ready and MR will do a new release with all this.

Thanks!

[ahopkins]

Awesome! Much better idea.

…

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 16, 2018, at 5:30 PM, Manuel Miranda ***@***.***> wrote: I've added some changes to finish this MR and pass the tests. I have removed the use_list option because instead of hardcoding it I want to allow the user to pass it in the constructor. Next MR will be about this :). Once I have the next MR ready and MR will do a new release with all this. Thanks! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.