-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A People's Data Toolkit. #2
Comments
I think also connecting successful open and public technology case studies would be most impactful. Rather than just a list of descriptive stats, think of having a case study where city X has implemented Y solution that shows Z difference in open data metrics. Then connect that to the member's city by saying that hey if you did Y solution you could have a Zish savings like city X! The Civic Analytics Network has much of this. |
Cool idea @patwater See here: https://www.cbo.gov/topics/infrastructure-and-transportation |
There's actually a long tradition of those sorts of grassroots study efforts. The League of Women Voters does those sorts of studies. Ralph Nader's Public Citizen Research Group is another great example. This could also build on the National Neighborhood Indicators Project. There's a lot of energy in the CfA community for brigades to take on this more sort of data-driven advocacy role. This Congressional Data Collaborative could provide infrastructure for that. Cori Zarek at CfA has been working on this sort of compendium of case studies and would be a great collaborator. I'll add her to the thread on twitter |
Also I wonder if this is an opportunity to use the Airbnb Knowledge repo? |
@patwater knowledge repo is a good conceptual outcome but its tool-creep at this stage. I'd prefer focusing on the content and methodology using To this end, I've drafted a |
HT to https://twitter.com/DevinBalkind & https://twitter.com/jalbertbowdenii to emphasize people focus over party focus. |
For every US Congressional District, aggregate open data towards answering basic questions about the state of their constituency.
This information should be centered around tax-paying constituents (you and me) but their to collect evidence about issues they care about in their locales.
In Q1 2018, your constituency had:
... so on and so forth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: