Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: skip unnecessary workflows if only have documentary changes #10156

Closed
LinuxSuRen opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12006
Closed

Suggestion: skip unnecessary workflows if only have documentary changes #10156

LinuxSuRen opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #12006
Assignees
Labels
area/build Build or GithubAction/CI issues area/docs Incorrect, missing, or mistakes in docs type/feature Feature request type/tech-debt

Comments

@LinuxSuRen
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

As I mentioned in the title. It's totally not necessary to run the whole workflow all the time.

Use Cases

As you can see below, I only made some documentary changes in this PR

image

See #10155

We could skip the e2e workflow by some filters.

Message from the maintainers:

Love this enhancement proposal? Give it a 👍. We prioritise the proposals with the most 👍.

@LinuxSuRen LinuxSuRen added the type/feature Feature request label Dec 2, 2022
@caelan-io
Copy link
Member

agreed. we are considering this. related to #10265

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/build Build or GithubAction/CI issues area/docs Incorrect, missing, or mistakes in docs type/feature Feature request type/tech-debt
Projects
None yet
3 participants