New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the bad result #3
Comments
about this question,do I also need to play with hyperparameter? "max_mention_span": 10, "random_seed": 0, "log_path": "logs/pairwise_scorer/", |
The result seems to be predicted model,how can I run the gold model?I have set use_gold_mentions true. but this seems to be the result of predicted model. thanks. |
could you tell me the config's settings of the best gold model? such as the settings of use_gold_mentions、subtopic、use_predicted_topics、topic_level、keep_singletons. when I set use_gold_mentions true,subtopic true,use_predicted_topics false,topic_level true,keep_singletons false, the result of conll f1 is just 71.How can I get the result of 81? thanks very mach. |
Oh, I have know the reason why the result is bad, the get_ecb_data.py get the dataset without singletons, but the best result is with the singletons, so the save_gold_conll_files in get_ecb_data.py should be :
and the subtopic = true,topic_level = true,keep_singletons = true. |
Hello, have you reached the score of 81 in the paper? My running result is always around 79 |
hi,I run this code fluently,But the result is bad,I don't know what’s wrong with this. could you please give me some suggestions?thanks。
python -u run_scorer_test.py ./models/pairwise_scorers/test_events_average_0.8_model_3_corpus_level.conll events Processing file: ./models/pairwise_scorers/test_events_average_0.8_model_3_corpus_level.conll 0.65 1.0 0.787878787878788 0.8205128205128205 0.8205128205128205 0.8205128205128205 0.5474218379209004 0.6790832621385336 0.6061858323184838 0.15918234423790356 0.7040757533599581 0.2596591430831051 0.4649510356293238 0.6254223508155559 0.5333783332066294 {'mentions_recall': 0.65, 'mentions_precision': 1.0, 'mentions_f1': 0.787878787878788, 'muc_recall': 0.8205128205128205, 'muc_precision': 0.8205128205128205, 'muc_f1': 0.8205128205128205, 'bcub_recall': 0.5474218379209004, 'bcub_precision': 0.6790832621385336, 'bcub_f1': 0.6061858323184838, 'ceafe_recall': 0.15918234423790356, 'ceafe_precision': 0.7040757533599581, 'ceafe_f1': 0.2596591430831051, 'lea_recall': 0.4649510356293238, 'lea_precision': 0.6254223508155559, 'lea_f1': 0.5333783332066294, 'conll': 56.211926530480305}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: