Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 18, 2022. It is now read-only.

Test with ggfeed-v1 messages #257

Closed
KyleMaas opened this issue Feb 20, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Test with ggfeed-v1 messages #257

KyleMaas opened this issue Feb 20, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@KyleMaas
Copy link
Collaborator

See %MiW/j32viwG2/rtMCwgXWASPPc9FxSTYCCqrgxZKVFk=.sha256

https://github.com/cryptix/js-gabbygrove

@arj03
Copy link
Owner

arj03 commented Feb 22, 2021

Please note that a new feed format is quite a bit change in more or less the whole stack ;-) I would like to get to a point where we can do that easier, like EBT is prepared for it now. I think we will need multiple feeds in first. I am personally very excited about bamboo (note it has a wasm port).

@cryptix
Copy link
Contributor

cryptix commented Feb 22, 2021

+1 to what Anders said. And while we are here... :)

ps: While I would love for gabby grove to see adoption, I also heard that cbor libs with canonical (integers) mode are not as off the shelve across languages as I would have liked and thought. Therefore even if bamboo has a bit more custom requirements there it might be worthwhile.

pps: I made half a decoder for it in go and it would be pretty easy to add to go-ssb but without stack support in JS-land I don't see a need to hurry.

ppps: there are some interesting issues on the bamboo spec repo, too. I'd wager we might want to cut a v2 of it, reconsider the hash function and sizes and maybe replace stlv with tfk (which we already use in groups) along the way.

@KyleMaas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oooh, bamboo does indeed look very nice. Hadn't seen that before. I do wish there was an MIT-licensed version, though.

@KyleMaas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

KyleMaas commented Mar 1, 2021

I'm going to go ahead and close this, then, since this is likely to change a lot before we actually need to look at it.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants