Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extra_plugin_paths config ignored #1223

Open
douglas-raillard-arm opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

extra_plugin_paths config ignored #1223

douglas-raillard-arm opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@douglas-raillard-arm
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the issue
The following doc shows some configuration options that are seemingly ignored. They are documented as "possibly picked up by an instrument" so it could make sense, but something like extra_plugin_paths seems like it should be interpreted at the beginning of the loading process.
https://workload-automation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_information.html#meta-configuration

Other comments (optional)

The context is adding support to specify plugin packages by Python package name instead of a filesystem path. Filesystem paths are good for user-developed plugins but integrate pretty badly with standard distribution on PyPI. For example, I need to specify that the plugins to load are in lisa.wa.plugins package, regardless of where that sits in the filesystem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant