Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow search to return all #24

Closed
quite opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

allow search to return all #24

quite opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@quite
Copy link

quite commented Mar 26, 2021

I'd prefer to use search for listing emojis, as it includes, just for example what I was missing now: '☐' U+2610 9744 e2 98 90 ☐ BALLOT BOX (Other_Symbol). emoji does not include this, because it is not deemed an emoji, not in certain emoji codepoint blocks, or so?

@arp242
Copy link
Owner

arp242 commented Mar 26, 2021

The search command searches for codepoints; the emojis that are a single codepoint are returned by this, but those that consist of multiple aren't.

For example:

$ uni -q s flag
'⚐'  U+2690  9872   e2 9a 90    ⚐   WHITE FLAG (Other_Symbol)
'⚑'  U+2691  9873   e2 9a 91    ⚑   BLACK FLAG (Other_Symbol)

But the pirate flag emoji consists of multiple emojis:

$ uni e -qf '%(emoji) %(cpoint) %(name)' 'pirate flag'
🏴☠ U+1F3F4 U+200D U+2620 U+FE0F pirate flag

There is all sorts of special handling for emojis; I don't think combing them is a good idea.

As for your ballot box icon:

$ uni s ballot
     cpoint  dec    utf8        html       name (cat)
'☐'  U+2610  9744   e2 98 90    ☐   BALLOT BOX (Other_Symbol)
'☑'  U+2611  9745   e2 98 91    ☑   BALLOT BOX WITH CHECK (Other_Symbol)
'☒'  U+2612  9746   e2 98 92    ☒   BALLOT BOX WITH X (Other_Symbol)
'✗'  U+2717  10007  e2 9c 97    ✗    BALLOT X (Other_Symbol)
'✘'  U+2718  10008  e2 9c 98    ✘   HEAVY BALLOT X (Other_Symbol)
'⮽'  U+2BBD  11197  e2 ae bd    ⮽   BALLOT BOX WITH LIGHT X (Other_Symbol)
'🗳'  U+1F5F3 128499 f0 9f 97 b3 🗳  BALLOT BOX WITH BALLOT (Other_Symbol)
'🗴'  U+1F5F4 128500 f0 9f 97 b4 🗴  BALLOT SCRIPT X (Other_Symbol)
'🗵'  U+1F5F5 128501 f0 9f 97 b5 🗵  BALLOT BOX WITH SCRIPT X (Other_Symbol)
'🗶'  U+1F5F6 128502 f0 9f 97 b6 🗶  BALLOT BOLD SCRIPT X (Other_Symbol)
'🗷'  U+1F5F7 128503 f0 9f 97 b7 🗷  BALLOT BOX WITH BOLD SCRIPT X (Other_Symbol)
'🗹'  U+1F5F9 128505 f0 9f 97 b9 🗹  BALLOT BOX WITH BOLD CHECK (Other_Symbol)

That seems to work as expected, as it's a single codepoint? There is no special handling in print/search at all based on the character type, outside of formatting the control characters and combining characters. So I'm not sure what went wrong there?

@quite
Copy link
Author

quite commented Mar 26, 2021

Sorry, I left out some information. What I really want is indeed to use uni to output all emojis, codepoints etc. Including names, so that I can pipe it all to bemenu (a dmenu for X/Wayland) and search incrementally...

@quite
Copy link
Author

quite commented Mar 26, 2021

And yes, ballot was found by search all along :)

@arp242
Copy link
Owner

arp242 commented Mar 26, 2021

I don't know; maybe it could be unified, but there's a lot of special handling involved, and there are probably a few UX issues that will crop up.

Considering that this is a tool I wrote for my own purposes and that overall I'm pretty happy with it as a user, the chance that I will work on this is very close to zero. I'm always happy to accommodate people's use cases, but there's a limit to the amount of work I'm willing to spend on that. Just want to be clear about expectations here 😅

I might consider merging patches, but that will depend a bit on whether I like the UI. Considering it would be a significant rewrite this actually might be better off as a fork (the amount of work is the same).

As a workaround, you can create a simple wrapper script which calls uni and pipe the output of that to bemenu.

@quite
Copy link
Author

quite commented Mar 26, 2021

I realized that I can do something like that, yes. Combining output of uni -q emoji all and uni -q print all. Sry for taking your time.

@quite quite closed this as completed Mar 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants