-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LICENSE? #19
Comments
Never bothered with it. Do you think I need one? |
It's best to put a license on it. Otherwise the default is that you retain rights and can go after anyone who uses it. For more info, read http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/04/pick-a-license-any-license.html |
Wow, I had no idea about the implied copyright. Thanks for the info! |
Isn't this closed because you solved the problem? |
Have I? |
Didn't you add a license? |
@The-AJ26: This is licensed under the 2-clause BSD license (license file is here: https://github.com/ArtemGordinsky/SpotiFree/blob/master/SpotiFree/License.txt). @ArtemGordinsky: It's customary to put a LICENSE file (usually no extension necessary, or .md extension if Markdown, or .txt if you choose) in the root of the project, and to have a quick "This project is licensed under the two clause BSD license, see LICENSE for more information." section towards the bottom of the README (see Dokku for an okay-ish example). I can fork and create a PR for this if you'd like. This issue can be closed, as far as I can tell. |
This one is a little confusing. There is a license file (https://github.com/ArtemGordinsky/Spotifree/blob/master/Spotifree/License.txt) and it's most, but not all, of the MIT license. There's a past issue (artemgordinskiy/Spotifree#19) in which someone claims it's BSD 2-clause, but I see no evidence for that and it's a confusing issue anyway.
This one is a little confusing. There is a license file (https://github.com/ArtemGordinsky/Spotifree/blob/master/Spotifree/License.txt) and it's most, but not all, of the MIT license. There's a past issue (artemgordinskiy/Spotifree#19) in which someone claims it's BSD 2-clause, but I see no evidence for that and it's a confusing issue anyway.
you know the drill
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: