Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TreeTagger] Specify executable and model via parameters #5

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 22, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I would be nice to optionally secify all neccessary properties, executables and 
resources in the parameters of the analysis engine.

Example:
The TreeTagger installation for its wrapper in DKPro is currently only added by 
maven. It's not possible for other developers to include DKPro components only 
with the descriptors.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by pklu...@gmx.de on 1 Feb 2011 at 2:06

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by richard.eckart on 3 Feb 2011 at 10:29

  • Changed title: [TreeTagger] Specify external resources as parameter

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 1 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by richard.eckart on 3 Feb 2011 at 10:52

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Added the parameters, but did not test.

Path to TreeTagger binary can be specified with a parameter.

If a model is specified, three parameters need to be set for the model path, 
the model encoding and the tag-type mapping properties file. An example for 
such a file can be found here:

https://code.google.com/p/dkpro-core-asl/source/browse/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.
core-asl/trunk/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core.treetagger/src/main/resources/de/tu
darmstadt/ukp/dkpro/core/treetagger/map/en-tagger.map

Original comment by richard.eckart on 3 Feb 2011 at 11:04

  • Changed title: [TreeTagger] Specify executable and model via parameters
  • Changed state: Fixed
  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant