forked from stefaniegehrke/dhd2016-boa
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
vorträge-010.xml
383 lines (383 loc) · 30.3 KB
/
vorträge-010.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="vorträge-010">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Modelling the Scholarly Domain beyond Infrastructure </title>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Gradmann</surname>
<forename>Stefan</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Literary Studies Research Unit, Belgien</affiliation>
<email>stefan.gradmann@kuleuven.be</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Hennicke</surname>
<forename>Steffen</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Georg-Eckert-Institut, Leibniz-Institut für internationale Schulbuchforschung, Deutschland</affiliation>
<email>hennicke@leibniz-gei.de</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Tschumpel</surname>
<forename>Gerold</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Deutschland</affiliation>
<email>gerold.tschumpel@student.hu-berlin.de</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Dill</surname>
<forename>Kristin</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Universität Wien, Institut für Germanistik, Österreich</affiliation>
<email>kristin.dill@univie.ac.at</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Thoden</surname>
<forename>Klaus</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin, Deutschland</affiliation>
<email>kthoden@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Pichler</surname>
<forename>Alois</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Universität Bergen, Philosophisches Institut, Norwegen</affiliation>
<email>alois.pichler@fof.uib.no</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Morbindoni</surname>
<forename>Christian</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Semedia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italien</affiliation>
<email>christian.morbidoni@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<author>
<name>
<surname>Stiller</surname>
<forename>Juliane</forename>
</name>
<affiliation>Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin, Deutschland</affiliation>
<email>jstiller@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de</email>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition>
<date>2015-12-30T22:44:00Z</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<publisher>Elisabeth Burr, Universität Leipzig</publisher>
<address>
<addrLine>Beethovenstr. 15</addrLine>
<addrLine>04107 Leipzig</addrLine>
<addrLine>Deutschland</addrLine>
<addrLine>Elisabeth Burr</addrLine>
</address>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<p>Converted from a Word document </p>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<appInfo>
<application ident="DHCONVALIDATOR" version="1.17">
<label>DHConvalidator</label>
</application>
</appInfo>
</encodingDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="category">
<term>Vortrag</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="subcategory">
<term></term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="keywords">
<term>Scholarly Domain Model</term>
<term>Scholarly Primitives</term>
<term>Modellierung</term>
<term>Methodologie</term>
<term>Virtuelle Forschungsinfrastruktur</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="ConfTool" n="topics">
<term>Modellierung</term>
<term>Theoretisierung</term>
<term>Infrastruktur</term>
<term>Methoden</term>
<term>Forschungsprozess</term>
<term>virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text>
<body>
<p>This paper presents the findings of research conducted in the EU-funded project Digitised Manuscripts to Europeana
<ref type="note" target="n01" n="1">1
</ref> (DM2E), which investigated how the modelling of scholarly practices and research processes might inform the development of research environments for digital scholarship in the humanities. In particular, the
<hi rend="italic">Scholarly Domain Model</hi> (SDM) will be presented as a framework for modelling the domain of digital scholarship, which provides the constituents for the systematic enquiry of continuously evolving Virtual Research Environments (VRE)
<ref type="note" target="n02" n="2">2
</ref> and the emergence of digital practices and methodology within them. The importance of models and a practice of modelling cannot be overestimated for the creation of research environments that advance beyond a level of infrastructure, and achieve sustainability through the focus on the evolving scholarly practices at the heart of the transition that altered the humanities profoundly in the last decades.
</p>
<p>International institutions of research funding have contributed tremendous efforts
into that transitory process and have encouraged a variety of projects for the
advancement of the Digital Humanities <ref type="note" target="n03" n="3">3
</ref>, focusing on attempts to further the development of infrastructures for
digital scholarship in the humanities. In Europe, for example, the European Strategy
Forum on Research Infrastructures (<ref
target="http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=esfri"
>ESFRI</ref>) has funded several infrastructure projects such as the Digital
Research Infrastructures for the Arts and Humanities (<ref
target="http://www.dariah.eu/">DARIAH</ref>) and the Common Language Resources
and Technology Infrastructure (<ref target="http://www.clarin.eu/">CLARIN</ref>),
which have since been complemented by the Data Service Infrastructure for the Social
Sciences and Humanities (<ref target="http://dasish.eu/about_dasish/">DASISH</ref>).
Each of these infrastructure projects have, in turn, influenced a number of other
endeavours on a national, regional, institutional or disciplinary level. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, achieving a constellation of constituents and influential factors that facilitate the prospective sustainability of a Virtual Research Environment as a socio-technical system, is still an unresolved problem. Whereas this certainly is due to many reasons, we believe that among them a deficit of systematic investigation into the actual research practices of humanists and their sustainable representation in the digital realm is of crucial importance. We consider the inclusion of the scholars essential as the actors of a community of practice, who constitute precisely with this scholarly practice the basis for the development of research environments and infrastructures. </p>
<p>In this context, the research gap we identified and attempt to address is the lack of
a model, which emphasises the importance of creating a bridge connecting the
analogue and digital scholarly practices and, most importantly, underlines the
recursive relationship between these scholarly practices and the models and
applications reflecting on them. This kind of research falls within what is
typically called ’digital humanities’ and which we understand as a community of
practices, regardless of their particular materiality. We therefore believe that in
order to be able to discuss the ’digital humanities’ in a way that goes beyond
simply discussing infrastructure, and so that the aforementioned challenge can be
overcome, we need to start from a modelling process that allows for the systematic
and theoretically grounded integration of practices of humanist research approaches
in both the analogue and digital world. In this paper, we discuss this undertaking
and propose a multi-layered model, the SDM, that exemplifies the constituents of our
modelling endeavour. For this reason, the SDM is conceived as an explicit but not
definite set of constituents of the domain of digital scholarship in the humanities.
In his presentations Manfred Thaller has repeatedly stressed, that the controversy
of the ’digital humanities’ should rather focus on the scholarly practices in the
digital humanities and in particular their prerequisites, the various
epistemological implications that the application of digital technology entail, than
to be predominated by arguments about labelling (cf. Thaller 2013, 2015a, 2015b;
McCarty / Short 2002).</p>
<p>In this regard, Linked Data standards <ref type="note" target="n04" n="4">4
</ref> such as the Resource Description Framework (RDF), Resource Description
Framework Schema (RDFS), and Web Ontology Language (OWL) constitute a well suited
means for the development of the SDM, because they allow the process of modelling to
be iterative and continuous since the graph of semantic statements created is
extensible. Furthermore, it facilitated the development of the modules of a digital
humanities research environment, which has been built around the semantic annotation
application <ref target="http://thepund.it/">Pundit</ref>. As we will see, this is also an instance of a still uncommon and emerging
way to think of Linked Data as an art with epistemological implications for the
practice of modelling the domain of digital scholarship in the humanities (cf.
Oldman et al. 2016). </p>
<p>Like other models since, the SDM takes up the notion of Scholarly Primitives (cf.
Unsworth 2000) and develops them further. On the basis of the analysis and
observation of the practices of digital scholarship, we are endeavouring to acquire
a better understanding of the requirements for instructing the development of
sustainable infrastructures that enable scholars to harness the potential of digital
technology and hence to develop appropriate digital methodologies and practices.
This requires to proceed beyond the establishment of static models to the iterative
and continuous activity of modelling. Starting from the Scholarly Primitives by
Unsworth (2000), the SDM was further constructed and refined by analysing the
research literature and related models (cf. Atkins et al. 2003; Project Bamboo 2010;
Benardou et al. 2010; Palmer et al. 2009). Furthermore, the conceptual input has
been subsequently revised and supplemented by empirical evidence collected through a
series of interviews with scholars and researchers from the humanities, and
experiments using the Linked Data annotation environment Pundit. Finally, the
development of the SDM has continuously been monitored and counselled by an <ref
target="http://dm2e.eu/dhab/">advisory board of Digital Humanists</ref>. </p>
<p>Furthermore, the SDM differs from the work done, for example, by DARIAH and the Network of Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities (<ref target="http://www.nedimah.eu/">NeDiMAH</ref>)
<ref type="note" target="n05" n="5">5
</ref> in so far as it approaches the scholarly domain from a more comprehensive perspective that tries to integrate Primitives and constituents influencing the processes of digital scholarship in the humanities and to reflect on their social construction on different layers of abstraction. Furthermore, we believe that a continuous and recursive process of modelling is ultimately the goal, not the model itself. With reference to Willard McCarty (2003, 2004 and 2005), resonating a distinction, introduced by Geertz (1973) between a model ‘of’ something and a model ‘for’ something, the SDM in that sense is a descriptive model ‘of’ the scholarly domain and as imperfect it may be, it is built for a purpose and it may fail. The benefit of this failure, for that matter, is that it emphasises the importance of modelling in many respects. As for the modelling of scholarly practices of the digital humanities may further the self-reflection and pattern discovery resulting in new models ‘of’ these practices as well as in models ‘for’ the conduct of such new modes of digital scholarly activities in the Virtual Research Environments developed concomitantly. The SDM attempts to provide an explicit but not definite set of constituents to initiate a self-reflected development of Research Environments for Digital Scholarship in the Humanities on the basis of scholarly practices going beyond infrastructure.
</p>
<p>In sum, the SDM is a framework for better understanding scholarly research practices and the ways digital working modes might evolve in the future. Despite the fact that the SDM has been devised in the context of applications based on Linked Data, the model is independent from particular representations and meant to be applicable as a reference model for the discussion, evaluation and development of digital research infrastructures and environments for the humanities. The SDM allows to create representations of the workflows of digital humanists and to function as a terminological bridge between the scholarly practices of the humanities and digital applications. The goal is to reflect on the social nature of scientific practice, regardless of its materiality, and, based on such reflections, to receive a stable core for its sustainable representation. Only if we better understand how scholars undertake their research and how their functional framework might be adequately translated to the digital environment, we might actually approach the emergence of new digital modes of working.</p>
</body>
<back>
<div type="Notes">
<note xml:id="n01" n="1">The project ran from Feb. 2013 until Jan. 2015. URL:
<ref target="http://dm2e.eu/">http://dm2e.eu/</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]; for a more
detailed account cf. further Hennicke et al. 2015. </note>
<note xml:id="n02" n="2">Cf. Candela et al. 2013. Respective Research Infrastructure.</note>
<note xml:id="n03" n="3">We understand this term to be grounded in the basis of
the translation of the German word for <hi rend="italic"
>Geisteswissenschaften </hi>and not in the political sense (also cf.
Gold 2012; Terras et al. 2013).</note>
<note xml:id="n04" n="4">Cf. for the following standards <ref
target="http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/rdf"
>http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/rdf</ref> and <ref
target="http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/owl"
>http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/owl</ref> [all last accessed 15.
October 2015].</note>
<note xml:id="n05" n="5">In particular, the Methods Ontology (<ref target="http://nemo.dcu.gr/">NEMO</ref>);
cf. further Hughes et al. 2016 for a more detailed account.</note>
</div>
<div type="bibliogr">
<listBibl>
<head>Bibliographie</head>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Anderson, Sheila / Blanke, Tobias / Dunn, Stuart</hi>
(2010): “Methodological commons: arts and humanities e-science
fundamentals”, in: <hi rend="italic">Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society A</hi> Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 368,
1925: 3779-3796 <ref
target="http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/368/1925/3779.short"
>http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/368/1925/3779.short</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Atkins, Daniel E. / Droegemeier, Kelvin K. / Feldman,
Stuart I.</hi> (2003): <hi rend="italic">Revolutionizing science and
engineering through cyberinfrastructure</hi>. Report of the National
Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Library Press <ref
target="http://www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf"
>http://www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf</ref> [last accessed 15.
October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Project Bamboo</hi> (2010): <hi rend="italic">Project
bamboo scholarly practice report</hi>
<ref
target="https://googledrive.com/host/0B3zU098zQ8VMc2xfMUJZaWxXNWs/wp-content/uploads/Project-Bamboo-Scholarly-Practices-Report.pdf"
>https://googledrive.com/host/0B3zU098zQ8VMc2xfMUJZaWxXNWs/wp-content/uploads/Project-Bamboo-Scholarly-Practices-Report.pdf</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Benardou, Agiatis / Constantopulos, Panos / Dallas, Costis
/ Gavrilis, Dimitris</hi> (2010): “A conceptual model for scholarly
research activity”, in: Reilly, Maeve (ed.):<hi rend="italic"> iConference
Papers 2010</hi>
<ref
target="https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/14945/benardou.pdf?sequence=2"
>https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/14945/benardou.pdf?sequence=2</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Candela, Leonardo / Castelli, Donatella / Pagano,
Pasquale</hi> (2013): “Virtual research environments: An overview and a
research agenda”, in: <hi rend="italic">Data Science Journal</hi> 12:
GRDI75-GRDI81. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">CLARIN</hi>: <hi rend="italic">CLARIN</hi>. Common
Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure <ref
target="http://www.clarin.eu/">http://www.clarin.eu/</ref> [last
accessed 15. October 2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">DARIAH</hi>: <hi rend="italic">DARIAH-EU</hi>. Digital
Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities <ref
target="http://www.dariah.eu/">http://www.dariah.eu/</ref> [last
accessed 15. October 2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">DASISH</hi>: <hi rend="italic">DASISH</hi>. Data Service
Infrastructure for the Social Sciences and Humanities <ref
target="http://dasish.eu/about_dasish/"
>http://dasish.eu/about_dasish/</ref> [last accessed 15. October
2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">DM2E</hi>: "Digital Humanities Advisory Board" <ref
target="http://dm2e.eu/dhab/">http://dm2e.eu/dhab/</ref> [last accessed
15. October 2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">ESFRI</hi>: <hi rend="italic">ESFRI</hi>. European
Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures <ref
target="http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=esfri"
>http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=esfri</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Geertz, Clifford</hi> (1973): <hi rend="italic">The
interpretation of cultures</hi>. Selected essays. New York: Basic
Books.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Gold, Matthew K.</hi> (2012): <hi rend="italic">Debates in
the Digital Humanities</hi>. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Hennicke, Steffen / Gradmann, Stefan / Dill, Kristin /
Tschumpel, Gerold / Thoden, Klaus / Morbidoni, Christian / Pichler,
Alois</hi>: <hi rend="italic">D3.4</hi>. Research Report on DH Scholarly
Primitives <ref
target="http://dm2e.eu/files/D3.4_2.0_Research_Report_on_DH_Scholarly_Primitives_150402.pdf"
>http://dm2e.eu/files/D3.4_2.0_Research_Report_on_DH_Scholarly_Primitives_150402.pdf</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Hughes, Lorna / Constantopoulos, Panos / Dallas,
Costis</hi> (2016): “Digital Methods in the Humanities: Understanding
and Describing their Use across the Disciplines”, in: Schreibman, Susan /
Siemens, Ray / Unsworth, John (eds.): <hi rend="italic">A new Companion to
Digital Humanities</hi>. New York: John Wiley & Sons 150-170.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">McCarty, Willard</hi> (2002): “Humanities computing:
Essential problems, experimental practice”, in: <hi rend="italic">Literary
and Linguistic Computing</hi> 17, 1: 103-125 <ref
target="http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/1/103.full.pdf+html"
>http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/1/103.full.pdf+html</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">McCarty, Willard</hi> (2003): “Knowing true things by what
their mockeries be: Modelling in the humanities”, in: Woolridge, Russon /
McCarty, Willard / Winder, William (eds.): <hi rend="italic">Computing in
the Humanities Working Papers</hi>
<ref
target="http://journals.sfu.ca/chwp/index.php/chwp/article/view/A.24/52"
>http://journals.sfu.ca/chwp/index.php/chwp/article/view/A.24/52</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">McCarty, Willard </hi>(2004): “Modeling: A study in words
and meanings”, in: Schreibman, Susan / Siemens, Ray / Unsworth, John (eds.):
<hi rend="italic">A Companion to Digital Humanities</hi>. Malden:
Blackwell 254-272.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">McCarty, Willard</hi> (2005): <hi rend="italic">Humanities
computing</hi>. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">McCarty, Willard / Short, Harold</hi> (2002): “Mapping the
field: Report of ALLC meeting held in Pisa, April 2002” <ref
target="http://www.allc.org/node/188">http://www.allc.org/node/188</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">NeDiMAH</hi>: <hi rend="italic">NeDiMAH</hi>. Network for
Digital Methods in the Arts and Humanities <ref
target="http://www.nedimah.eu/">http://www.nedimah.eu/</ref> [last
accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">NeMo</hi>: <hi rend="italic">NeMo</hi>. NeDiMAH Methods
Ontology <ref target="http://nemo.dcu.gr/">http://nemo.dcu.gr/</ref> [last
accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Net7</hi>: <hi rend="italic">Pundit</hi>
<ref target="http://thepund.it/">http://thepund.it/</ref> [last accessed 15.
October 2015].</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Oldman, Dominic / Doerr, Martin / Gradmann, Stefan</hi>
(2016): “Zen and the Art of Linked Data: New Strategies for a Semantic Web
of Humanist Knowledge”, in: Schreibman, Susan / Siemens, Ray / Unsworth,
John (eds.): <hi rend="italic">A new Companion to Digital Humanities</hi>.
New York: John Wiley & Sons 251-273.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Palmer, Carole L. / Teffeau, Lauren C. / Pirmann, Carrie
M.</hi> (2009): <hi rend="italic">Scholarly Information Practices in the
Online Environment</hi>. Themes from the Literature and Implications for
Library Service Development. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research <ref
target="http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-02.pdf"
>http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-02.pdf</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Schreibman, Susan / Siemens, Ray / Unsworth, John</hi>
(eds.) (2004): <hi rend="italic">A Companion to Digital Humanities</hi>.
Malden: Blackwell <ref target="http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/"
>http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/</ref> [last accessed 15.
October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Schreibman, Susan / Siemens, Ray / Unsworth, John</hi>
(eds.) (2016): <hi rend="italic">A new Companion to Digital Humanities</hi>.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Terras, Melissa / Nyhan, Julianne / Vanhoutte, Edward</hi>
(eds.) (2013): <hi rend="italic">Defining Digital Humanities</hi>. A Reader.
Farnham: Ashgate.</bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Thaller, Manfred</hi> (2013): <hi rend="italic">Praising
Imperfection</hi>. Why editions do not have to be finished <ref
target="http://www.culingtec.uni-leipzig.de/ESU_C_T/node/292"
>http://www.culingtec.uni-leipzig.de/ESU_C_T/node/292</ref> [last
accessed 15. Oktober 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Thaller, Manfred</hi> (2015a): <hi rend="italic">Digital
Humanities</hi>. Eine Bestandsanalyse <ref
target="https://de.dariah.eu/documents/10180/472723/Thaller_Digital+Humanities+-+eine+Bestandsanalyse.pdf"
>https://de.dariah.eu/documents/10180/472723/Thaller_Digital+Humanities+-+eine+Bestandsanalyse.pdf</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Thaller, Manfred</hi> (2015b): <hi rend="italic">Wenn die
Quellen überfliessen</hi>. Spitzweg und Big Data <ref
target="https://static.uni-graz.at/fileadmin/veranstaltungen/von-daten-zu-erkenntnissen/thaller_keynote.pdf"
>https://static.uni-graz.at/fileadmin/veranstaltungen/von-daten-zu-erkenntnissen/thaller_keynote.pdf</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
<bibl><hi rend="bold">Unsworth, John</hi> (2000): “Scholarly Primitives: What
methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools
reflect this?” In: <hi rend="italic">A symposium on Humanities Computing:
formal methods, experimental practice sponsored by King's College,
London, May 13, 2000</hi>
<ref
target="http://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html"
>http://people.brandeis.edu/~unsworth/Kings.5-00/primitives.html</ref>
[last accessed 15. October 2015]. </bibl>
</listBibl>
</div>
</back>
</text>
</TEI>