Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The result of width=100% and cols= is different from HTML and PDF #356

Closed
programandala-net opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

The result of width=100% and cols= is different from HTML and PDF #356

programandala-net opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
bug compliance
Milestone
v1.5.0.alpha.19

Comments

@programandala-net
Copy link

I've realised width=100% seems to make no effect. Also, cols= doesn't make the table 100% wide, while Asciidoctor and Asciidoctor PDF do.

I attach a test with source, HTML, PDF and EPUB. The width of some tables by Asciidoctor EPUB3 is different from those by Asciidoctor and Asciidoctor PDF. See tables 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.

I'm using the latest version of Asciidoctor EPUB3, compiled from the updated repo.

Thanks.
@slonopotamus slonopotamus added this to the v1.5.0.alpha.19 milestone Jul 27, 2020
@programandala-net
Copy link
Author

Just tried the fixed version. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug compliance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.5.0.alpha.19
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@slonopotamus @programandala-net