You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I.e. the cross reference to the section starting with a backtick is not interpreted and no link tag is created.
Asciidoctor only emits the info message for the reference to "Unexisting":
asciidoctor: INFO: possible invalid reference: Unexisting
Expected behavior:
Preferred solution: The reference is interpreted and an a tag is created
Alternative: An info message is created (as for "Unexisting")
I'm not sure if this is an error, or if this is intended behavior. Perhaps there is another way to reference a section title starting with a backtick? I know about referencing by ID, but in this case I prefer referencing by title.
This issue seems to be different than #3642, because backticks in titles seem to work in general: Referencing the other section containing backticks (but not starting with backticks) works correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If a section title starts with a backtick, a cross reference to it is not resolved and no warning is emitted.
Example:
Current behavior:
The generated HTML for the "Referencing Section" looks like this:
I.e. the cross reference to the section starting with a backtick is not interpreted and no link tag is created.
Asciidoctor only emits the info message for the reference to "Unexisting":
Expected behavior:
Preferred solution: The reference is interpreted and an
a
tag is createdAlternative: An info message is created (as for "Unexisting")
I'm not sure if this is an error, or if this is intended behavior. Perhaps there is another way to reference a section title starting with a backtick? I know about referencing by ID, but in this case I prefer referencing by title.
This issue seems to be different than #3642, because backticks in titles seem to work in general: Referencing the other section containing backticks (but not starting with backticks) works correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: