Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ASH rewards for JWL-USDC Farm #31

Open
SuperRareBears opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Remove ASH rewards for JWL-USDC Farm #31

SuperRareBears opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@SuperRareBears
Copy link

SuperRareBears commented Apr 21, 2024

Summary

Proposal to discontinue Farm rewards for USDC-JWLUSDC Farm on AshSwap-

erd1qqqqqqqqqqqqqpgqlzksd2k9drsm0gfdd832zn4gpela33p44fvs7qs3lk

Motivation

A decentralized system is not about monopoly, currently JewelSwap has a total of 14 Farms on AshSwap with Ash rewards.
Not only does this equate to a large amount of extra emissions, but due to voting power & accumulation of veASH this hinders chances for smaller Projects to pass a proposal to add their own farm.

A recent example includes TAO, which would have been a valuable addition to the ASH ecosystem. You would think that having a vested interest in ASHSWAP would mean you would want what is best for it.

Actions

Remove Ash rewards for JWL-USDC Farm

We know this vote won't pass, how can it?

Point proven!

@Classic298
Copy link

Classic298 commented Apr 22, 2024

  1. There are no extra ASH rewards and extra emissions. If the JewelSwap Farms are removed, the emissions will be split up to the other existing farms. Obviously the author of this proposal has no idea what he is talking about
  2. there is no JWL-USDC or JEWEL-USDC Farm. What Farm is trying to be delisted here? The description says "Remove Ash rewards for JWL-USDC Farm". How? There is no such farm.

"We know this vote won't pass, how can it?"

Yes, how should it pass? This proposal makes no sense. It's trying to delist a non existent farm. What would even happen if it passes? There is no farm that would be affected by this proposal.

This proposal is syntactically and schematically wrong and total nonsense.

Veto

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants