Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 18, 2018. It is now read-only.

Include libuv in shared runtime instead of Kestrel packages #730

Closed
muratg opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Include libuv in shared runtime instead of Kestrel packages #730

muratg opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@muratg
Copy link
Contributor

muratg commented Apr 6, 2016

From @muratg on April 5, 2016 22:8

We need to

  • Make libuv a Kestrel dependency (instead of including it IN the package)
  • Include the libuv package in shared runtime.

Benefits:

  • Being able to service libuv without touching Kestrel
  • Clean up the kestrel dependency graph
  • Simplify project-to-project references (where you have to include libuv-build package in the project currently)
  • Much smaller size for Kestrel package

Copied from original issue: aspnet/Coherence-Signed#244

@muratg
Copy link
Contributor Author

muratg commented Apr 6, 2016

From @halter73 on April 5, 2016 22:28

@weshaggard This should be tracking the creation of the libuv package.

@muratg Is there a reason we're tracking this in a private repo? I was going to link to it from https://github.com/dotnet/cli/issues/2277

@muratg muratg added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Apr 6, 2016
@halter73 halter73 self-assigned this Apr 11, 2016
@halter73 halter73 reopened this Apr 11, 2016
@halter73
Copy link
Member

Sorry. Wrong issue to close. The Libuv package is now on the https://www.myget.org/F/aspnetcirelease feed, but not in the shared runtime yet.

@weshaggard
Copy link

Do we know when this is going to happen?

@muratg
Copy link
Contributor Author

muratg commented Jun 7, 2016

This is done.

@muratg muratg closed this as completed Jun 7, 2016
@cesarblum
Copy link
Contributor

For reference: https://github.com/dotnet/cli/issues/2277

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants