Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4.1.4.9.3. ThirdPartiesBillingIndicator #154

Open
cryptolopes opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

4.1.4.9.3. ThirdPartiesBillingIndicator #154

cryptolopes opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug in law There's an error or a mistake in the writing of the decree documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@cryptolopes
Copy link
Member

cryptolopes commented Apr 22, 2021

O Decreto Executivo 317/20 não esclarece quanto à utilização do elemento ThirdPartiesBillingIndicator para a aplicação do regime de IVA Cativo. Porém o schema já previa essa possibilidade através deste elemento 17beca8.

Proposta para alteração da documentação associada ao elemento

<xs:element name="ThirdPartiesBillingIndicator">
    <xs:annotation>
      <xs:documentation>
        Indicador de regime de IVA de Caixa
        Deve ser preenchido com:
        "0" - Se não cumprir com nenhuma condição;
        "1" - se o documento for emitido em nome e por conta de terceiros;
        "2" - se respeitar ao regime de IVA Cativo;
        "3" - se cumprir com as condições 1 e 2 em simultâneo.
      </xs:documentation>
    </xs:annotation>
    <xs:simpleType>
      <xs:restriction base="xs:integer">
        <xs:minInclusive value="0" />
        <xs:maxInclusive value="3" />
      </xs:restriction>
    </xs:simpleType>
  </xs:element>

Deve ser interpretado como um esquecimento ou, pelo contrário, deve ignorar-se transpondo exatamente como está descrito do Decreto Executivo?

@cryptolopes cryptolopes added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested bug in law There's an error or a mistake in the writing of the decree labels Apr 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug in law There's an error or a mistake in the writing of the decree documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant