New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request - masks from apertures #259
Comments
@keflavich This is a good suggestion and it was actually how I thought about approaching #161. I've been a bit swamped lately, but I hope to get to this soon. |
I was just looking for this feature and sad to find that it does not exist... |
Patience, @pllim. I'm working on it. |
So far, I can get around it by getting the fractions out of the aperture and build a mask off it. But you said you're going to remove the fractions, so please keep me updated. Thanks! |
Oh I could really use this right now. |
This feature was added in #453. See the |
This may be better thought of as a pyregion issue, but it is relevant to the existing photutils setup and highlights some of the overlap between the two packages.
I would like to be able to return a 2D mask from an image given an input aperture (either Sky or pixel). Both a boolean mask (containing all overlap or all contained pixels) and a floating-point fractional pixel mask could be useful depending on the situation.
This is also related to #161, but specifically about 2D masks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: