Namespace

[kelunik]

Should we go with Interop\Async as namespace instead of Interop\Async\EventLoop?

I created a promise draft, using Interop\Async\Promise\Promise seems bad and as we just have a few interfaces, I think it'd be fine to use just Interop\Async as namespace for both.

[bwoebi]

I agree on that one, makes it easier to just import one namespace for all promisy and loopy stuff. (like promise transformation functions we'll probably provide (?))

also… less to type :-D

Interop\Async should provide its fundamental primitives at its main namespace - not need to split that up. (If we'd have naming conflicts, that'd be anyway bad as it makes importing harder/requires aliases - so that should be avoided anyway.)

[WyriHaximus]

also… less to type :-D

IDE autocompletion 😛

[sagebind]

I'm in favor of a single, shorter namespace.

[kelunik]

Looks like we have consensus here. 👍