Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add merge many-to-one transformation #2580

Closed
igarashitm opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Add merge many-to-one transformation #2580

igarashitm opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
cat/enhancement group/runtime status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon

Comments

@igarashitm
Copy link
Member

igarashitm commented Feb 16, 2021

xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ENTESB-12357

Merge multiple source collection fields into target collection. Which is the best action name, merge or join?

/Address1<a>/line1 => /TargetAddr<b>/line1
/Address1<a>/line2 => /TargetAddr<b>/line2
...
/Address2<c>/line1 => /TargetAddr<b>/line1
/Address2<c>/line2 => /TargetAddr<b>/line2

where b = a + c

@pleacu
Copy link
Collaborator

pleacu commented Feb 17, 2021

append implies order where merge just implies they're all in one bucket.

@igarashitm
Copy link
Member Author

Good point, plus Append action already exists for string. Let's avoid it.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 18, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon label Aug 18, 2021
@igarashitm igarashitm removed the status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon label Aug 20, 2021
@Shrishti1234
Copy link

Shrishti1234 commented Jan 13, 2022

I also needed this feature in my use case. When this feature will be released or there is some another way to handle the same scenario in atlasmap?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon label Apr 16, 2022
@igarashitm igarashitm removed the status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon label Apr 18, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 31, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions!

@stale stale bot added the status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon label Jul 31, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cat/enhancement group/runtime status/stale Issue considered to be stale so that it can be closed soon
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants