New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add merge
many-to-one transformation
#2580
Comments
append implies order where merge just implies they're all in one bucket. |
Good point, plus |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions! |
I also needed this feature in my use case. When this feature will be released or there is some another way to handle the same scenario in atlasmap? |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions! |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity since 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions! |
xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ENTESB-12357
Merge multiple source collection fields into target collection. Which is the best action name, merge or join?
where
b = a + c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: