Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Monix Task integration: taskAttempt behaves differently from Task.attempt #138

Closed
benhutchison opened this issue Apr 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@benhutchison
Copy link
Collaborator

Test case at: benhutchison@48168df#diff-cff438ec1f43164ec2aa67018334de6bR175

@benhutchison
Copy link
Collaborator Author

benhutchison commented Apr 25, 2018

This evaluation throws an exception:

taskDelay[Fx.fx1[Task], Unit](()).map(_ => throw new Exception()).taskAttempt.runAsync.runSyncUnsafe(1.seconds)

While this one traps its and returns a left Either:

taskDelay[Fx.fx1[Task], Unit](()).map(_ => throw new Exception()).runAsync.attempt.runSyncUnsafe(1.seconds)

The difference is the first uses taskAttempt Eff-combinator, while the second uses underlying monix operation on the final task.

Problem is that there are some situations where this isn't a desirable change to make in program. When using Writer for logging, I think it is better to interpret Writer after Errors, to end up with:

val (result, logs) = program.taskAttempt.runWriter.runAsync.runSyncUnsafe(1.seconds)

But if the attempt must be done at the end, on Task, then you'll only get logs for a successful run, and its often during errors the logs are most useful.

@benhutchison
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think I understand why this happens. taskAttempt appends an attempt call onto every existing task in the Eff expression. But the map call doesnt wrap the exception in a task, and so (only) if it comes at the end of the chain, it'll come after the last attempt.

The workaround is to wrap anything that could throw in a taskDelay, which is a fair ask if you're using Task as an IO type.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant