Package manager should allow dependencies to be placed on other plugins #2412
Comments
Thanks for the suggestion! 🙇 I think there's a related discussion going on in atom/apm#120, so wanted to just link to that here. |
@izuzak Is there any update for this issue? It blocks writing spec for the dependent packages. Because current |
@lijunle No updates as far as I know of. I think atom/apm#120 (comment) explains the current status and the team's thoughts about this. Sorry if this is causing problems for you and I do understand how useful this ability would be. Once the initiatives the team is focused on currently are shipped, we'll decide what to focus on next (based on everyone's feedback and goals, as we have been doing so far). |
Are there any updates on this? |
@ikatanic These guys are usually quite good with their issue updating. If there are updates on an issue, they will update the relevant issue. If you know what I mean. |
have you guys noticed this npm package: https://github.com/travs/atom-package-dependencies ? |
For what it's worth, in DocPad land, we use npm's |
The behavior of |
That's correct, hence why we already add the extra checks, and will be adding such installation magic to our own system, which we plan to abstract out into an independent system, if useful to others. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you can still reproduce this issue in Safe Mode then please open a new issue and fill out the entire issue template to ensure that we have enough information to address your issue. Thanks! |
Currently, packages that are pluggable (such as autocomplete-plus, and AtomLinter) are dependent on their own implementations of plugin style functionality. In order to better support packages like this I think that we should be able to support packages having dependencies.
What I would like to see is capabilities added for the following.
This would give us the ability to dynamically, and bi-directionally link modules to each other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: