License should be CC-BY-SA 3.0, not unlicense

[anothersimulacrum]

This contains data lifted directly from DDA, which is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0, making this a derivative work, which should be licensed under the same (or compatible) license.

[AtomicFox556]

Noted; I'm not particularly knowledgeable on legal stuff so this is appreciated. Will change it as soon as I can get to it, though in practice I'd not care what people want to do with it.

[AtomicFox556]

License updated by copy-pasting license text from DDA license. Care to confirm the fix?

Edit: if that's why someone blocked me in DDA repository, tell that specific person to go fuck themselves as I can't do that personally now. Some people are too busy to respond within less than a day, so if they don't understand it, they deserve it.

[anothersimulacrum]

You have a BSD license there (that's the license for libbacktrace), not CC-BY-SA 3.0. You can just do as DDA does and have Cataclysm is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.

[AtomicFox556]

Apparently I've fucked it up again. Fixed now.

[anothersimulacrum]

Looks good, thanks.