Add support for Swift 3.2 (Xcode 9)

[serieuxchat]

I know that it's a bit early now, but being able to compile with Xcode 9 (and Swift 3.2) would be really cool (since code completion and the editor in general is SO much nicer in the new Xcode).

[lorentey]

Agreed 100%! I'm still in San Jose with just my iPad; I won't be able to update BigInt until I get back to my Mac... If you have free time to do it, go for it! PRs are very welcome! ;) BTW, Swift 4 has new integer protocols that make big integer libraries lot easier to implement & perform much faster. Updating to it is more work, but it'll definitely be worth the effort.

…

On 2017. Jun 9., at 0:27, Sergey Novitsky ***@***.***> wrote: I know that it's a bit early now, but being able to compile with Xcode 9 (and Swift 3.2) would be really cool (since code completion and the editor in general is SO much nicer in the new Xcode). — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[konstantin-tcherkashin]

+1

[dropski]

Same here, iOS 11 arrive in 5 days ;) and Xcode 9 has much better flow than earlier versions

[jjv360]

Xcode 9 is out now and it can't build anymore... Any news on when support for Swift 3.2 will be added? Or at least a workaround we can use in the mean time?

---

EDIT: For now I'm using this fork ...

pod "BigInt", :git => "https://github.com/crmitchelmore/BigInt.git"

[lorentey]

BigInt 3.0.0 supports (in fact, requires) Xcode 9 and Swift 4. It was released two weeks ago.

I did not test interoperability with Swift 3.2, but it is supposed to work. Please file new bugs if there are issues with that or with CocoaPods integration.

[konstantin-tcherkashin]

Cocoapods saying that last version is 2.1.2

[lorentey]

I pushed a button; the 3.0.0 pod should be available now.