Workbox.js

[dav-is]

It appears you are using custom service worker code? Maybe using workbox.js would make for a longer term solution as it is being actively maintained, so you wouldn't need to worry about it.

Also, don't take my many issues I've opened as disrespect. I appreciate the work you've done and think you've done a much better job than a lot of the other boilerplates.

Thanks,
Davis

[tirthbodawala]

@dav-is I don't know if you understand, but your contribution is In-Valuable to the project. Informing about improvements is something we really really appreciate. Your name has been echoing in the office from past 2 days.
You are the Hero of knowledge @ Atyantik :) Please keep up the great contribution.

[tirthbodawala]

@dav-is We have used our custom logic as we are proving more functionality than workbox.js at the moment, which include local caching, custom API request caching. I think we can find a workaround to include workbox.js in upcoming milestones. but as of now as I go through their documentation we have covered most of the part.

[tirthbodawala]

@dav-is We have implemented workbox-sw but as a lib in core. We were unable to make it functional via
yarn add due to the following issue
GoogleChrome/workbox#352

But once its solved we shall move it to node_modules again.