Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standard template fails due to Travis CI #1807

Closed
carsten-engelke opened this issue Dec 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Standard template fails due to Travis CI #1807

carsten-engelke opened this issue Dec 27, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@carsten-engelke
Copy link

Description:

The described "standard" template at: https://github.com/audreyfeldroy/cookiecutter-pypackage is using travis ci, which seems to have changed (and is not working without giving the company billing information). Shouldn't the standard template make use of open source software only? Which ones are the best alternative? -> being new to this tool, this already made me look into other boilerplate options for python.

@michaeljoseph
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @carsten-engelke 👋🏼 I think this perhaps is an issue for the template project itself and not cookiecutter?

Several alternative templates are listed here: https://github.com/audreyfeldroy/cookiecutter-pypackage#similar-cookiecutter-templates

@carsten-engelke
Copy link
Author

Hi @carsten-engelke 👋🏼 I think this perhaps is an issue for the template project itself and not cookiecutter?

Several alternative templates are listed here: https://github.com/audreyfeldroy/cookiecutter-pypackage#similar-cookiecutter-templates

Travis not working for free is a problem with the template (that has been discussed for 2 years). There are several alternatives that solve it already. I posted the issue here, because I think it is a bad choice as standard template and might need a switch to one of the alternatives (e.g. https://github.com/zillionare/cookiecutter-pypackage)

@ZenulAbidin
Copy link

Hi guys, I'm working on a patch for pypackage that allows you to select between Github Actions and Travis CI. I think that should solve the problem.

@jensens
Copy link
Contributor

jensens commented Jun 12, 2023

This is OT here, please report over in the specific project.

@jensens jensens closed this as completed Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants