New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update build for .NET Core SDK 2.0.0 #867
Comments
We're currently building against .NET SDK 1.1.0 but when the time comes this will be a good reminder of one of the things we may need to address. No docs on that method because it's |
Note we'll still try to target a lower version of |
Ah, I see. I can just update the name of the extension method, then. Forgot to note: I left |
The Autofac website talks about .NET Core, but will it just run on .NET Standard or is that work still being done? |
@hawkerm Have you tried it or looked at the code? |
@hawkerm .NET Standard <= 1.1 should work fine with the current nuget package. Sorry if this is redirecting the discussion of the enhancement, but as far as the difference between |
@alexBraidwood yes .NET core is an implementation of the standard, but for support it's the other way around.
If you build for That's just why I was asking more explicitly as the Autofac site called out .NET core vs. .NET standard, but it looks like they're targeting standard 1.1 as @tillig called out. |
OK, the dotnet SDK being targeted during build is now 2.1.2; VS 15.5.2 should work; and I renamed the |
While working on adding this for a personal project and feeling great about making a pull request, I noticed there's an extension method collision for .net standard 2.0.
SequenceExtensions.Append (no docs?) is colliding with a shiny new gift from Microsoft: System.Linq.Enumerable.Append.
I thought this is likely used across projects and was worried about pressing forward with a breaking name change. I added conditional compilation symbols and a quick google of the repo didn't reveal any additional usages, so I carried on.
Here's the commit, currently: alexBraidwood@7fe8feb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: