Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable use of additional intrinsic functions within Fn::FindInMap #73

Closed
rhbecker opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Enable use of additional intrinsic functions within Fn::FindInMap #73

rhbecker opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
feature request Proposal for new features or requests status/done

Comments

@rhbecker
Copy link

rhbecker commented May 12, 2022

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Tell us about your request

Enable use of additional intrinsic functions within Fn::FindInMap.

Per the documentation ...

You can use the following functions in a Fn::FindInMap function:

  • Fn::FindInMap
  • Ref

Tell us about the problem you are trying to solve. What are you trying to do, and why is it hard?

As an example of how other functions would be useful ...

I'm defining a template in which I want to enforce documented parameter value constraints for the AWS::KMS::Key resource type - particularly its KeyUsage property.

The relevant portions of my template are below. I'm not pasting a fully formed template because I want to highlight only the relevant parts. The very last line exhibits what I'm requesting ...

Parameters:

  AsymmetricRSAKeyUsage:
    Type: String
    AllowedValues:
      - ENCRYPT_DECRYPT
      - SIGN_VERIFY
    Default: ENCRYPT_DECRYPT

  KeySpec:
    Type: String
    AllowedValues:
      - ECC_NIST_P256
      - ECC_NIST_P384
      - ECC_NIST_P521
      - ECC_SECG_P256K1
      - HMAC_224
      - HMAC_256
      - HMAC_384
      - HMAC_512
      - RSA_2048
      - RSA_3072
      - RSA_4096
      - SYMMETRIC_DEFAULT
    Default: SYMMETRIC_DEFAULT

Conditions:
  IsKeyAsymmetricRSA: !Equals ['RSA', !Select [0, !Split [_, !Ref KeySpec]]]

Mappings:
  KeyPrefix:
    ECC:
      usage: SIGN_VERIFY
    HMAC:
      usage: GENERATE_VERIFY_MAC
    SYMMETRIC:
      usage: ENCRYPT_DECRYPT

Resources:
  Key:
    Type: AWS::KMS::Key
    Properties:
      KeyUsage: !If
        - IsKeyAsymmetricRSA
        - !Ref AsymmetricRSAKeyUsage
        - !FindInMap [KeyPrefix, !Select [0, !Split [_, !Ref KeySpec]], usage]

Are you currently working around this issue?

It seems like the only alternative is a lot of nested conditions?

I think the below would work, using the same parameters in the above example, but with the KeyPrefix mapping removed ...

Conditions:
  IsKeyAsymmetricECC: !Equals ['ECC', !Select [0, !Split [_, !Ref KeySpec]]]
  IsKeyAsymmetricRSA: !Equals ['RSA', !Select [0, !Split [_, !Ref KeySpec]]]
  IsKeyHMAC: !Equals ['HMAC', !Select [0, !Split [_, !Ref KeySpec]]]

Resources:
  Key:
    Type: AWS::KMS::Key
    Properties:
      KeyUsage: !If
        - IsKeyAsymmetricRSA
        - !Ref AsymmetricRSAKeyUsage
        - !If
          - IsKeyAsymmetricECC
          - SIGN_VERIFY
          - !If
            - IsKeyHMAC
            - GENERATE_VERIFY_MAC
            - ENCRYPT_DECRYPT

What is the expect behavior with this new feature

Example provided above.

Additional context

You all do fine work and I appreciate you.

Attachments

n/a

@muneebar muneebar added the feature request Proposal for new features or requests label May 13, 2022
@muneebar
Copy link

@rhbecker Thanks for your contribution! We'll triage and take a look at it. Stay tuned for updates!

@jtting-amazon
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for the feedback! We have launched this feature as part of the FindInMap enhancement:

Docs: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/intrinsic-function-reference-findinmap-enhancements.html

@rhbecker
Copy link
Author

I can't believe this made it into your queue with only one 馃憤 - really appreciate the effort here! Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Proposal for new features or requests status/done
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants