Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(codedeploy): ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to Deployment Groups #26957

Merged
merged 15 commits into from Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

nrgeil
Copy link
Contributor

@nrgeil nrgeil commented Aug 31, 2023

The alarms on a CodeDeploy group are configurable to be enabled or disabled through the SDK or UI. Bringing in that functionality to the CDK to have parity. The parameter name mirrors the "Ignore alarm configuration" checkbox in the alarm configuration section of the UI.

Motivation: Developers are able to disable rollback on alarm, but this leaves deployments in a stopped state should any alarms be active. Including this configuration will align with the expectation that alarms will not block a deployment in lower environments via a flag rather than logic to include/exclude alarms on the deployment group based on environment. I'm sure there are other use cases for disabling the alarm configuration on a deployment group.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

…ment groups

The alarms on a CodeDeploy group are configurable to be enabled or disabled through
the SDK or UI. Bringing in that functionality to the CDK to have parity.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK label Aug 31, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team August 31, 2023 18:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Aug 31, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@nrgeil nrgeil changed the title feat(aws-codedeploy): Introduce ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to aws-codedeploy feat(codedeploy): Introduce ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to aws-codedeploy Sep 13, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review September 13, 2023 11:03

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Sep 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@lpizzinidev lpizzinidev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks (and sorry for the late review)! 👍
Looks good overall.
In my opinion, there are some missing unit tests and a slight adjustment in parameter ordering.

@@ -884,4 +884,33 @@ describe('CodeDeploy ECS DeploymentGroup', () => {
));
});
});

test('can ignore alarm status when alarms are present', () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test cases should be added for each deployment group to verify that the configuration is disabled when ignoreAlarmConfiguration: true, alarms is not empty, and the @aws-cdk/aws-codedeploy:removeAlarmsFromDeploymentGroup feature flag is enabled (this condition).

Comment on lines 37 to 38
removeAlarms = true,
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: boolean = false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
removeAlarms = true,
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: boolean = false,
ignoreAlarmConfiguration = false,
removeAlarms = true,

I think it's better/clearer to keep the feature flag parameter last.

@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ new codedeploy.LambdaDeploymentGroup(stack, 'BlueGreenDeployment', {
],
preHook,
postHook,
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: false,

Redundant

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ new codedeploy.ServerDeploymentGroup(stack, 'CodeDeployGroup', {
failedDeployment: false,
deploymentInAlarm: false,
},
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
ignoreAlarmConfiguration: false,

Redundant

nrgeil and others added 2 commits October 25, 2023 06:13
- Update parameter ordering
- Add missing unit tests for removeAlarms feature flag
- Drop redundant integration test changes
@nrgeil
Copy link
Contributor Author

nrgeil commented Oct 25, 2023

Thanks (and sorry for the late review)! 👍
Looks good overall.
In my opinion, there are some missing unit tests and a slight adjustment in parameter ordering.

Thanks for the review! Sorry it took me a while to address your comments, my github notifications must be disabled. I think I addressed everything, but let me know if there's anything I missed. Appreciate the call out on the unit test I missed.

Copy link
Contributor

@lpizzinidev lpizzinidev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes!
Just some minor adjustments to be made.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member and removed pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. labels Oct 28, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@vinayak-kukreja vinayak-kukreja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @nrgeil thank you for opening this PR with us. I have some comments, please let me know if I can clarify anything.

CfnDeploymentGroup.AlarmConfigurationProperty | undefined {
export function renderAlarmConfiguration(
alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[],
ignorePollAlarmFailure?: boolean,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, why is this optional now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was possible to be undefined before. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this equivalent? It got called out in community review to simplify, but I'd be happy to revert.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is equivalent. Ideally this would have been part of a property bag to begin with, but now doing so is a breaking change. So no update needed here.

Comment on lines 37 to 38
ignoreAlarmConfiguration = false,
removeAlarms = true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the new property should be at the end. Since this is an exported function, someone could be using it and now their third parameter would be referencing another argument.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny enough, that's what I had originally. There was a request to flip it here for readability, but to your point usability should probably supersede.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vinayak-kukreja is right, we cannot flip it because it would be a breaking change to flip. However, I have an alternate solution: we deprecate renderAlarmConfiguration entirely and build renderAlarmConfigurationV2.

It would look like this:

export function renderAlarmConfiguration(alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[], ignorePollAlarmFailure: boolean | undefined, removeAlarms = true) {
  return renderAlarmConfigurationV2({ alarms, ignorePollAlarmFailure, removeAlarms });
}

export interface renderAlarmConfigProps {
  readonly alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[],
  readonly ignorePollAlarmFailure?: boolean,
  /** default true */
  readonly removeAlarms?: boolean,
  // your new prop
}

export function renderAlarmConfigurationV2(props: renderAlarmConfigProps) {
  // the original implementation plus your new prop
}

This would mean updating all the places we use renderAlarmConfiguration to renderAlarmConfigurationV2, but I think this is the correct path to go down.

@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

Nudging you again @nrgeil. Let us know if you are willing to continue work on this PR!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nrgeil nrgeil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about the delayed response, missed the github notifications.

Thanks for the review! The comments conflict a little with the previous community review, so let me know how you'd like me to proceed. I'll hold off on pushing a new commit until I have clarification.

CfnDeploymentGroup.AlarmConfigurationProperty | undefined {
export function renderAlarmConfiguration(
alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[],
ignorePollAlarmFailure?: boolean,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was possible to be undefined before. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this equivalent? It got called out in community review to simplify, but I'd be happy to revert.

Comment on lines 37 to 38
ignoreAlarmConfiguration = false,
removeAlarms = true,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny enough, that's what I had originally. There was a request to flip it here for readability, but to your point usability should probably supersede.

Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @nrgeil, thanks for responding. I looked through the outstanding comments a bit more and have just the one thing for you. The rest of the code looks good, I'm happy to approve once the comment is addressed. Thanks for your contributions!

Comment on lines 37 to 38
ignoreAlarmConfiguration = false,
removeAlarms = true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vinayak-kukreja is right, we cannot flip it because it would be a breaking change to flip. However, I have an alternate solution: we deprecate renderAlarmConfiguration entirely and build renderAlarmConfigurationV2.

It would look like this:

export function renderAlarmConfiguration(alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[], ignorePollAlarmFailure: boolean | undefined, removeAlarms = true) {
  return renderAlarmConfigurationV2({ alarms, ignorePollAlarmFailure, removeAlarms });
}

export interface renderAlarmConfigProps {
  readonly alarms: cloudwatch.IAlarm[],
  readonly ignorePollAlarmFailure?: boolean,
  /** default true */
  readonly removeAlarms?: boolean,
  // your new prop
}

export function renderAlarmConfigurationV2(props: renderAlarmConfigProps) {
  // the original implementation plus your new prop
}

This would mean updating all the places we use renderAlarmConfiguration to renderAlarmConfigurationV2, but I think this is the correct path to go down.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Dec 18, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@kaizencc
Copy link
Contributor

kaizencc commented Jan 9, 2024

@nrgeil pinging you again on this; this PR will soon be closed without any action

@mergify mergify bot dismissed kaizencc’s stale review January 10, 2024 11:25

Pull request has been modified.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Jan 10, 2024
…urationV2

- Create props class
- Documentation updates
- Update implementation to handle defaults
*/
readonly ignorePollAlarmFailure?: boolean,
/**
* When no alarms are provided on an update, removes previously existing alarms from the construct.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is what's happening. It was pretty unclear to me what exactly this did so I wanted to make sure it got documented.

@vinayak-kukreja vinayak-kukreja removed their assignment Jan 23, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@kaizencc kaizencc changed the title feat(codedeploy): Introduce ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to aws-codedeploy feat(codedeploy): ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to CodeDeploy Groups Feb 12, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review February 12, 2024 22:32

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@kaizencc kaizencc changed the title feat(codedeploy): ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to CodeDeploy Groups feat(codedeploy): ignoreAlarmConfiguration parameter to Deployment Groups Feb 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @nrgeil I will work to get this one in. Thanks for your patience :)

packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-codedeploy/lib/private/utils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-codedeploy/lib/private/utils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-codedeploy/lib/private/utils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-codedeploy/lib/private/utils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-codedeploy/lib/private/utils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hopefully my changes pass the build :)

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 9b3be1d
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit e890e89 into aws:main Feb 12, 2024
10 checks passed
GavinZZ pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
…oups (#26957)

The alarms on a CodeDeploy group are configurable to be enabled or disabled through the SDK or UI. Bringing in that functionality to the CDK to have parity. The parameter name mirrors the "Ignore alarm configuration" checkbox in the alarm configuration section of the UI.

Motivation: Developers are able to disable _rollback_ on alarm, but this leaves deployments in a stopped state should any alarms be active. Including this configuration will align with the expectation that alarms will not block a deployment in lower environments via a flag rather than logic to include/exclude alarms on the deployment group based on environment. I'm sure there are other use cases for disabling the alarm configuration on a deployment group.

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK p2 pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants