You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when running aws s3 ls --summarize it returns:
[s3-bucket-1]
[s3-bucket-2]
...
Total Objects: 0
Total Size: 0
Describe the solution you'd like aws s3 ls --summarize to return the Total Objects and Total Size of all buckets:
[s3-bucket-1] (Total Objects: N | Total Size: N)
[s3-bucket-2] (Total Objects: N | Total Size: N)
...
Total Objects: [Combined Objects]
Total Size: [Combined Size]
Describe alternatives you've considered
A workaround script could loop through each bucket and parse this info with a command like this: aws s3 ls my-bucket-name --summarize --recursive --human-readable | tail -2
(^This would be easier if there were a --summary-only option as requested here: #2250)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Yoshiitaka sure! Thanks for offering to work on it. We recently made updates to our contribution process here that could be helpful to review as well.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently when running
aws s3 ls --summarize
it returns:Describe the solution you'd like
aws s3 ls --summarize
to return the Total Objects and Total Size of all buckets:Describe alternatives you've considered
A workaround script could loop through each bucket and parse this info with a command like this:
aws s3 ls my-bucket-name --summarize --recursive --human-readable | tail -2
(^This would be easier if there were a
--summary-only
option as requested here: #2250)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: