Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DownloadDBLogFilePortion often fails #921

Closed
mjdaly opened this issue Apr 9, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

DownloadDBLogFilePortion often fails #921

mjdaly opened this issue Apr 9, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
service-api This issue is due to a problem in a service API, not the SDK implementation.

Comments

@mjdaly
Copy link

mjdaly commented Apr 9, 2018

DownloadDBLogFilePortion often fails with error This file contains binary data and should be downloaded instead of viewed.

Support recommend using DownloadCompleteDBLogFile.

Expected Behavior

DownloadCompleteDBLogFile method can be called from AmazonRDSClient

Current Behavior

DownloadDBLogFilePortion can fail due to:

  1. too many API calls
  2. binary data in file.

Possible Solution

Add DownloadCompleteDBLogFile method to AmazonRDSClient

Your Environment

  • AWSSDK.Core version used: 3.3.2
  • Service assembly and version used: 3.3.2
  • Operating System and version: Win 10
  • Visual Studio version: 2017
  • Targeted .NET platform: .NET Core 2.0
@sstevenkang
Copy link
Contributor

What's the exception or error message you get?

@mjdaly
Copy link
Author

mjdaly commented Apr 16, 2018

@sstevenkang
Copy link
Contributor

This looks like a service side problem. I would open a support ticket against RDS. I don't think there's a whole lot we can do in the SDK.

@diehlaws diehlaws added service-api This issue is due to a problem in a service API, not the SDK implementation. and removed Service Issue labels Jan 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
service-api This issue is due to a problem in a service API, not the SDK implementation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants