Prevent failures on 2 subsequent warning alerts if S2N_ALERT_IGNORE_WARNINGS is set #2213
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes:
Previously when mode was set to
S2N_ALERT_IGNORE_WARNINGS
and warning was ignored, we did not clean up theconn->alert_in
buffer, so when we received a second warning we would fail the connection withS2N_ERR_ALERT_PRESENT
at the beginning ofs2n_process_alert_fragment
function.Call-outs:
One drawback is that we won't be able to fetch all warning alerts we received from the peer through
s2n_connection_get_alert
and only the fatal ones will get there. However, I think we can tackle that separately by introducing a different api to get multiple alerts.Testing:
Extended existing unit test to send 2 alerts and check that connection still works in
S2N_ALERT_IGNORE_WARNINGS
mode. The test fails without the change.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.