You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I was looking at the code, I found a very magical thing. When we use the encapsulated bind method, we will find that when we extend the function, all the methods we mount are named wrap, which is unsemantic.
And every time we use the bind method, we will create an array,I think this will be a big waste of resources
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When I was looking at the code, I found a very magical thing. When we use the encapsulated
bind
method, we will find that when weextend
the function, all the methods we mount are namedwrap
, which is unsemantic.And every time we use the bind method, we will create an array,I think this will be a big waste of resources
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: