Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a simple way to add a player with any hand ('x' in equity calculation softs) #200

Open
brunetton opened this issue Dec 27, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@brunetton
Copy link

brunetton commented Dec 27, 2021

When doing pre-flop simulations, I often want to compare a range or a hand against "anything", "x", "??", "any hand".

The current way to do it is to go to grid and select all possible combos using bottom slider. But this is quite time-consuming when simulating more than 3 players.

Proposals

  • I'd except that this "anything" should be the default preset for any new player added. This is the solution adopted by some other equity calculators I tried. The drawback of this is that any new added player would trigger a calculation (sometimes useless when you want to select a hand range by grid)
  • add a "?" special card like in "poker calculator". This allows to simply create ranges like "A?" (As and any other card)

Imagepipe_5

This button could be added somewhere in the cards selection screen:

Imagepipe_6

  • add a "Anything" range in grid. But this it's less straightforward to use than other options (more clicks to achieve it)

What do you think about that ?

Thanks !

@axross
Copy link
Owner

axross commented Apr 14, 2022

Thanks for the feedback! I needed to update my poker library in order to make the feature to support the use case you mentioned but I've just updated to support such calculation.

I still have a lot of things to do else so probably this feature is relatively low-prioritized but definitely I will consider to add this feature.

@brunetton
Copy link
Author

Thanks a lot !

I still have a lot of things to do else so probably this feature is relatively low-prioritized but definitely I will consider to add this feature.

Fingers crossed ! I know some friends that have the same thoughts.

Thanks !

@brunetton
Copy link
Author

Hi @axross, any chance you have some time for this?

Meta: did you thought about using issues bounties platforms like https://issuehunt.io for example? This maybe could help? Probably not if the problem is that you do not have time.
Anyway, thanks again for this high quality tool!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants