Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moodle 4.1 #281

Closed
nikoma opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 10 comments · Fixed by #299
Closed

Moodle 4.1 #281

nikoma opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 10 comments · Fixed by #299
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@nikoma
Copy link

nikoma commented Mar 18, 2023

Hi!
What an amazing template. Unfortunately it is only working for 3.9. How can we use this to deploy 4.1?

@naioja
Copy link
Collaborator

naioja commented Jun 8, 2023

This would require a bit of re-work as we would need to update the PHP version to 8.x and probably move to Ubuntu 22.04.

@naioja naioja self-assigned this Jun 8, 2023
@naioja naioja added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jun 8, 2023
@MarekSuwart
Copy link

MarekSuwart commented Jun 27, 2023

Template is now useless, as it depends on repositories that are not longer supporting outdated ubuntu (18.04)and php (7.4). Provisining of instances will fail.

@VFXpro
Copy link

VFXpro commented Jul 13, 2023

I have the same problem. I was about to deploy this template/stack, but since it's not using Moodle 4.x it's pointless.

@naioja
Copy link
Collaborator

naioja commented Jul 17, 2023

Template is now useless, as it depends on repositories that are not longer supporting outdated ubuntu (18.04)and php (7.4). Provisining of instances will fail.

I've updated the template to use 20.04 instead of 18.04 here 5ad4cd8 , also 3.9 is still in security support according to this link : https://download.moodle.org/releases/security/. That being said we are working on updating the entire tech stack.

@VFXpro
Copy link

VFXpro commented Jul 17, 2023

Thank you for the improvements @naioja. For us, Moodle 4.x is a requirement at the moment, that's why we can't use this ARM At the moment to build this new env we need.

@naioja
Copy link
Collaborator

naioja commented Jul 25, 2023

@VFXpro , @MarekSuwart , @nikoma I've published a branch on my fork of Moodle that should be now stable enough to test version 4 : https://github.com/naioja/Moodle/tree/aj_moodle4.
If you have the time please have a look and let me know your feedback, especially around the deployments using glusterfs help would be amazing.
For now I've been testing the Small Size setup and that is deployable.

@VFXpro
Copy link

VFXpro commented Jul 25, 2023

Thanks @naioja for updating the image. Based on our highly load perf testing (20,000 concurrent users in 10 min) GlusterFS was much slower than NFS, so we stay away from it. Will try to install it soon...

@Abel-Moremi
Copy link

@VFXpro , @MarekSuwart , @nikoma I've published a branch on my fork of Moodle that should be now stable enough to test version 4 : https://github.com/naioja/Moodle/tree/aj_moodle4. If you have the time please have a look and let me know your feedback, especially around the deployments using glusterfs help would be amazing. For now I've been testing the Small Size setup and that is deployable.

Mmmmh any updates on this and how do I go about deploying this? Do I just press deploy or I need a bit more leg work before i do...

I see that the "_artifacts Location" remains the same is that supposed to happen or not?

@VFXpro
Copy link

VFXpro commented Aug 25, 2023

Thanks @Abel-Moremi We can't use glusterfs anymore after thoroughly load testing it with 10,000 concurrent users... it was MUCH slower than a shared NFS storage.

@Abel-Moremi
Copy link

@VFXpro and @naioja Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants