You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is perhaps more of a clarification issue. In areas of an image where the window and shifted window all contain the same value (i.e. all in the same bin), variance = 0, and thus, correlation cannot be calculated (divide by 0). I ran glcm on WorldView satellite data in both R and ENVI, and these areas (often water) returned NA in R and 1.0 in ENVI. So it appears the R package is coded to return no data, but ENVI assigns a value of exactly 1.0. This may be good to clarify in the documentation. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is perhaps more of a clarification issue. In areas of an image where the window and shifted window all contain the same value (i.e. all in the same bin), variance = 0, and thus, correlation cannot be calculated (divide by 0). I ran glcm on WorldView satellite data in both R and ENVI, and these areas (often water) returned NA in R and 1.0 in ENVI. So it appears the R package is coded to return no data, but ENVI assigns a value of exactly 1.0. This may be good to clarify in the documentation. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: