Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: meta evaluation order #663

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2022
Merged

fix: meta evaluation order #663

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2022

Conversation

erdos
Copy link
Contributor

@erdos erdos commented Jan 15, 2022

Solves #659

@borkdude
Copy link
Collaborator

@erdos Do you want me to take it from here or do you intend to fix it? Do you need any hints where to fix it?

@erdos
Copy link
Contributor Author

erdos commented Jan 16, 2022

Hey @borkdude I think I got it now. My first impression about evaluator.cljc was wrong, the bug was in analyzer.cljc. I want to fix evaluation order for sets and vectors too but it should take much less time now.

@erdos erdos marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2022 10:34
@borkdude borkdude merged commit 7dc39d1 into babashka:master Jan 16, 2022
@borkdude
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

@erdos erdos deleted the fix-meta-order branch January 16, 2022 10:37
bobisageek pushed a commit to bobisageek/sci that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants