Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: move @babel/helper-annotate-as-pure to ts #12415

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 1, 2020

Conversation

JLHwung
Copy link
Contributor

@JLHwung JLHwung commented Nov 27, 2020

Q                       A
License MIT

@JLHwung JLHwung added PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories Flow -> TS Tracking repository migration from Flow to TS labels Nov 27, 2020
!!leadingComments &&
leadingComments.some(comment => /[@#]__PURE__/.test(comment.value));

export default function annotateAsPure(pathOrNode) {
export default function annotateAsPure(
pathOrNode: Node | { node: Node },
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this function does not use Path.prototype, I type the input as { node: Node }.

@babel-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

babel-bot commented Nov 27, 2020

Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/33757/

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2020

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit a8da9a8:

Sandbox Source
babel-repl-custom-plugin Configuration
babel-plugin-multi-config Configuration

@JLHwung JLHwung force-pushed the move-helper-annotate-as-pure-to-ts branch from 945d91d to b8ce51f Compare December 1, 2020 15:18
@JLHwung
Copy link
Contributor Author

JLHwung commented Dec 1, 2020

I didn't add flow types of this package because none of its dependents are type checked by Flow. Since we are unlikely to enable more Flow type check during the transition, I am good with deferring adding flow types for this package.

@existentialism
Copy link
Member

existentialism commented Dec 1, 2020

Should index have its extension changed to .ts?

@JLHwung JLHwung force-pushed the move-helper-annotate-as-pure-to-ts branch from b8ce51f to 41e0bad Compare December 1, 2020 15:41
@JLHwung JLHwung force-pushed the move-helper-annotate-as-pure-to-ts branch from 41e0bad to a8da9a8 Compare December 1, 2020 16:22
@JLHwung JLHwung merged commit 7000ae0 into babel:main Dec 1, 2020
@JLHwung JLHwung deleted the move-helper-annotate-as-pure-to-ts branch December 1, 2020 16:23
nicolo-ribaudo pushed a commit to nicolo-ribaudo/babel that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2020
* refactor: move @babel/helper-annotate-as-pure to ts

* chore: add flow types
@nicolo-ribaudo nicolo-ribaudo removed the PR: Internal 🏠 A type of pull request used for our changelog categories label Dec 2, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Mar 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Flow -> TS Tracking repository migration from Flow to TS outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants