docs(babel-standalone): remove bower mention #6588
Conversation
Since the package won't be downloadable as `@babel/standalone` it's best to just remove it, since it's pretty much deprecated as is. I left the other mention of babel-standalone-bower since I guess that's just the name and still useful in other cases cc @Daniel15 reported in babel#6495 (review)
|
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/7214/ |
|
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/5528/ |
|
Do we consider this as a breaking change since bowser user won't be able to download it. @Daniel15 do you have any stats about this? |
|
I guess the real breaking change was in #6495 🤔 I can't find bower stats |
|
We could keep the |
|
I don't have any stats, unfortunately. Installing babel-standalone via Bower pulls it from https://github.com/Daniel15/babel-standalone-bower, which hasn't been updated in a long time (last updated for 6.19.0). I automated it but the automation broke at some point and I never fixed it. Nobody's complained, so I wonder if anyone actually uses it 😛 |
|
Exactly. I think that’s why we should remove the mentions of it here! |
* docs(babel-standalone): remove bower mention Since the package won't be downloadable as `@babel/standalone` it's best to just remove it, since it's pretty much deprecated as is. I left the other mention of babel-standalone-bower since I guess that's just the name and still useful in other cases cc @Daniel15 reported in babel#6495 (review) * Update README.md
lock
bot
added
the
outdated
Since the package won't be downloadable as
@babel/standaloneit's best to just remove it, since it's pretty much deprecated as is. I left the other mention of babel-standalone-bower since I guess that's just the name and still useful in other casescc @Daniel15
reported in #6495 (review)