We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running with #2469 patch applied and using a table like this:
create table tab1 (col1 varchar(10)) insert into tab1 values('foobar') insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 insert into tab1 select col1 from tab1 select count(*) from tab1 > 4194304
When importing these records back with BCP, backend memory usage looks good:
But if we create an index on this table:
create index idx1 on tab1(col1)
And do the import after that, then backend memory usage looks like this:
I'll propose a patch to change the index handling.
BABEL_3_X_DEV (Default)
babelfishpg_tsql (Default)
Fedora
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
KushaalShroff
No branches or pull requests
What happened?
Running with #2469 patch applied and using a table like this:
When importing these records back with BCP, backend memory usage looks good:
But if we create an index on this table:
And do the import after that, then backend memory usage looks like this:
I'll propose a patch to change the index handling.
Version
BABEL_3_X_DEV (Default)
Extension
babelfishpg_tsql (Default)
Which flavor of Linux are you using when you see the bug?
Fedora
Relevant log output
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: