JoSS Review: Performance

[ghost]

In conjunction with the review of your package to JoSS (available at openjournals/joss-reviews#2014), here is an issue for you to address for your submission.

In your paper, you have stated that one of the advantages of recan over other methods of recombination detection (e.g. RAT and RDP4) is speed. However, I do not think the speed of recan should be compared to that of the aforementioned programs as the recombination auto-search function (which consumes a lot of run-time and is the main focus of RAT and RDP4) has not been implemented in recan.

[babinyurii]

Thank you for valuable comment, @lamhm. I agree with you, the speed comparison was incorrect. Now the paper was edited, and that statement was deleted.

[ghost]

Thanks a lot, @babinyurii. I confirm that the performance statement has been corrected in the paper. I will close this issue now.