New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/bookworm-team/bookworm/ubuntu focal Release' does not have a Release file. #321
Comments
I am getting the same error on Ubuntu 20.04
|
Same |
same here |
It seems that the last round of builds populating the PPA occurred before for the release of Ubuntu 20.04. Building the current release and supporting the Focal target for ongoing releases seems to be an important feature request for everyone in the Ubuntu sphere. |
Apologies for the late action - been a bit diverted away from Bookworm. |
The build has completed successfully for both the daily and stable repos. Please report back if you are still facing issues: https://code.launchpad.net/~bablu-boy/+recipe/bookworm-gh-stable |
So users currently updating from |
@brainchild0 The codebase is the same - and bookworm-team/bookworm was the earlier repository which is also built by the same receipe. So users can continue to update from the same. https://launchpad.net/~bookworm-team/+archive/ubuntu/bookworm |
I understand the principle of both archives holding the same build artifacts, but the I'm not sure I fully understand the comment, though. Are you deprecating one of the archives? |
Ok I see that new artifacts did finally go into the repository, but one combination still missing, the one I had been anticipating, is the short package name It seems the various package names, and the several different repositories, in current use are a source of confusion. Normally, packages in Debian repositories use short names, just long enough to identify them over other packages. If for some reason two package names must be offered that provide the same software, then one would be a metapackage, empty of any installed content, but giving the other as the dependency. Such conventions prevent redundancy or collisions. The best approach would appear to me to build from the source into a package called The use of multiple repositories would not seem to be a clear problem, but seems to create both to confusion and overhead, perhaps without comparable gain. |
When running
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bookworm-team/bookworm
I get
Is there a way of installing bookworm without enabling non-secure ppa repositories?
EDIT: I am installing this from Ubuntu 20.04 . If there is any other useful information I can provide do not hesitate to ask :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: