-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document bank processes for voiding an authorization hold #17
Comments
ping @khussein |
Actually, I think the best way to handle this is to have a place for the buyer to indicate whether they're using credit or debit/prepaid on the form used to collect payment information . If the payment is from a debit/prepaid, don't allow authorizations, just capture. This mimics standard procedure when you're using your card in a face to face environment so it shouldn't add friction to the checkout process and it can be done immediately by a marketplace instead of waiting for us to change the API. |
@matin +1 I think just a brief explanation in the documentation should suffice. Adding a bit more info on the API side is a plus. |
@timnguyen is it possible for Balanced to provide info on the card resource if the card it represents is a debit / credit card? Similar to how Balanced exposes brand (e.g. VISA/Amex) now? |
Addressing this issue on the balanced-docs/issues/54 |
From Wikipedia:
There needs to be communication through the API and/or documentation about when a hold is likely to drop off. The most problematic are prepaid and debit cards where there's real money being held by the bank.
A minimal solution would be to add a brief explanation and link to Wikipedia.
The next step could be to return the card type (prepaid, debit, charge, etc.) in the
cards
resource since the type is what generally determins the period required for the hold to fall off.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: